Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28891 - 28900 of 37039 for f h.

State v. Craig P. Helgeland
. Foss, 501 F.2d 522, 527 (1st Cir. 1974). A sentencing court is presumed to have acted reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12415 - 2005-03-31

State v. Gerald A. Cholewinski
)(f), Stats. [2] A no contest plea means that the defendant does not claim innocence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8092 - 2005-03-31

Walter V. Lee v. David Paulson
to this case. Wisconsin Stat. § 7.23(1)(f) provides for safekeeping of absentee voter applications
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2707 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Susan Schindelholz v. Joseph Vincenti
the filing fee. This, she argues, conflicts with § 801.02(6), which provides that “[f]ees payable upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7336 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Langlade County Department of Social Services v. Jeremy M., Sr.
. 1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5857 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Krystal G. J.
)(a), STATS., provides that "[i]f a child who has been adjudged delinquent violates a condition specified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9323 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
presented in United States v. Bakker, 925 F.2d 728, 741 (4th Cir. 1991), on which Rushing relies. ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159838 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
was necessary to achieve its sentencing objectives, so “[i]f counsel had argued for less time, it would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823112 - 2024-07-09

COURT OF APPEALS
Wisconsin Stat. § 814.04(4) provides: [I]f the judgment is for the recovery of money, interest at the rate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34865 - 2008-12-16

State v. Jill J. Kunish-Wolff
an opportunity to develop those facts supporting multiple charges. See United States v. Griffin, 765 F.2d 677
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12311 - 2005-03-31