Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2891 - 2900 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 2891 - 2900 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Renee L. Reek
and an order denying her postconviction motion for additional sentence credit. Reek argues that time she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2541 - 2017-09-19
and an order denying her postconviction motion for additional sentence credit. Reek argues that time she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2541 - 2017-09-19
State v. Renee L. Reek
of four misdemeanors and an order denying her postconviction motion for additional sentence credit. Reek
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2541 - 2005-03-31
of four misdemeanors and an order denying her postconviction motion for additional sentence credit. Reek
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2541 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Boivin
) denied his severance motion; and (3) exercised its sentencing NO. 96-3316-CR 2 discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11721 - 2017-09-20
) denied his severance motion; and (3) exercised its sentencing NO. 96-3316-CR 2 discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11721 - 2017-09-20
State v. Kenneth Boivin
; (2) denied his severance motion; and (3) exercised its sentencing discretion. Boivin also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11721 - 2005-03-31
; (2) denied his severance motion; and (3) exercised its sentencing discretion. Boivin also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11721 - 2005-03-31
State v. Darnell Jackson
appeals from an order denying his motion for additional sentence credit. For the reasons set forth below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7852 - 2005-03-31
appeals from an order denying his motion for additional sentence credit. For the reasons set forth below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7852 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard A. Hoeft
his motion to dismiss, which asserted that he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19759 - 2005-09-26
his motion to dismiss, which asserted that he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19759 - 2005-09-26
[PDF]
State v. Richard A. Hoeft
erred by denying his motion to dismiss, which asserted that he was denied his Sixth Amendment right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19759 - 2017-09-21
erred by denying his motion to dismiss, which asserted that he was denied his Sixth Amendment right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19759 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the motion, determining that Johnson was not in custody when he gave his statement and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259190 - 2020-05-06
the motion, determining that Johnson was not in custody when he gave his statement and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259190 - 2020-05-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
their motions.3 The circuit court did not reach the Kerlyluks’ underlying legal theory—that Riley and Knoop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44704 - 2014-09-15
their motions.3 The circuit court did not reach the Kerlyluks’ underlying legal theory—that Riley and Knoop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44704 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
for summary judgment and the circuit court granted their motions.[3] The circuit court did not reach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44704 - 2009-12-16
for summary judgment and the circuit court granted their motions.[3] The circuit court did not reach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44704 - 2009-12-16