Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2891 - 2900 of 30059 for de.
Search results 2891 - 2900 of 30059 for de.
State v. Ernest J.P., Jr.
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: Linda M. Van de water, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BROWN, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7128 - 2005-03-31
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: Linda M. Van de water, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BROWN, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7128 - 2005-03-31
Margaret Anderson v. David Anderson
of the court’s decision. See Hughes, 223 Wis. 2d at 120. We review questions of law de novo. See id. Our task
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16278 - 2005-03-31
of the court’s decision. See Hughes, 223 Wis. 2d at 120. We review questions of law de novo. See id. Our task
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16278 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Lenny Keding
legal errors. Therefore, we will review de novo whether the circuit court properly interpreted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11617 - 2017-09-19
legal errors. Therefore, we will review de novo whether the circuit court properly interpreted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11617 - 2017-09-19
State v. James E. Beasley
deficient performance prejudiced a defendant is an issue of law, subject to this court’s de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2242 - 2005-03-31
deficient performance prejudiced a defendant is an issue of law, subject to this court’s de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2242 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether Sieverding complied with § 800.14 is a question of law this court reviews de novo. See Welin v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208750 - 2018-02-22
. Whether Sieverding complied with § 800.14 is a question of law this court reviews de novo. See Welin v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208750 - 2018-02-22
[PDF]
City of Madison v. Vincent N. Spruill, Jr.
to apply constitutional principles to the facts, a matter of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6810 - 2017-09-20
to apply constitutional principles to the facts, a matter of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6810 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
. We review de novo whether the facts as found by the circuit court, and the undisputed facts, meet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35982 - 2014-09-15
. We review de novo whether the facts as found by the circuit court, and the undisputed facts, meet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35982 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
356, 362, 369 N.W.2d 186 (Ct. App. 1985). We do not review the record de novo, but rather search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66366 - 2011-06-22
356, 362, 369 N.W.2d 186 (Ct. App. 1985). We do not review the record de novo, but rather search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66366 - 2011-06-22
[PDF]
Jeffrey L. Sprewell v. Gary R. McCaughtry
, 504 (Ct. App. 1990), and determine de novo whether the department acted within its jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14073 - 2014-09-15
, 504 (Ct. App. 1990), and determine de novo whether the department acted within its jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14073 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Chad R. Rowe
principle is applicable to a given fact situation is a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12852 - 2017-09-21
principle is applicable to a given fact situation is a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12852 - 2017-09-21