Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2891 - 2900 of 29984 for de.
Search results 2891 - 2900 of 29984 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
We review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35531 - 2009-02-11
We review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35531 - 2009-02-11
City of Brookfield v. Daniel D. Ulmen
to the facts is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the circuit court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3624 - 2005-03-31
to the facts is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the circuit court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3624 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law, which this court can review de novo. Seraphine v. Hardiman, 44 Wis. 2d 60, 65, 170 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106567 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law, which this court can review de novo. Seraphine v. Hardiman, 44 Wis. 2d 60, 65, 170 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106567 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33503 - 2014-09-15
of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33503 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
City of Madison v. Vincent N. Spruill, Jr.
to apply constitutional principles to the facts, a matter of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6810 - 2017-09-20
to apply constitutional principles to the facts, a matter of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6810 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
James O'Connor v. Carma Sue Rainer
, 373 N.W.2d 47, 49 (Ct. App. 1985). We review the trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15695 - 2017-09-21
, 373 N.W.2d 47, 49 (Ct. App. 1985). We review the trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15695 - 2017-09-21
Vicki Lyons v. Dunn County
¶11 We review a circuit court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5607 - 2005-03-31
¶11 We review a circuit court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5607 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, would entitle the defendant to relief” is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Allen, 2004 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90590 - 2012-12-17
, would entitle the defendant to relief” is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Allen, 2004 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90590 - 2012-12-17
City of Sheboygan v. Korry L. Ardell
, whether a settlement is binding and thus enforceable by a court is a question of law that we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26068 - 2006-08-01
, whether a settlement is binding and thus enforceable by a court is a question of law that we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26068 - 2006-08-01
State v. Tammy F.
and interpretation. We review such questions de novo. See DOR v. Milwaukee Brewers Baseball Club, 111 Wis.2d 571
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9110 - 2005-03-31
and interpretation. We review such questions de novo. See DOR v. Milwaukee Brewers Baseball Club, 111 Wis.2d 571
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9110 - 2005-03-31