Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2891 - 2900 of 29810 for des.
Search results 2891 - 2900 of 29810 for des.
[PDF]
State v. William Oscar Marquis
of law subject to de novo review.” State v. Drexler, 199 Wis.2d 128, 133, 544 N.W.2d 903 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10103 - 2017-09-19
of law subject to de novo review.” State v. Drexler, 199 Wis.2d 128, 133, 544 N.W.2d 903 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10103 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Timothy M. Secrist
E. Bucher, district attorney, and Linda M. Van De Water, assistant district attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12944 - 2017-09-21
E. Bucher, district attorney, and Linda M. Van De Water, assistant district attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12944 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Sentry Insurance v. Jay Schrank
We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19683 - 2017-09-21
We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19683 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed. Before Neubauer, P.J., Reilly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83530 - 2014-09-15
court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed. Before Neubauer, P.J., Reilly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83530 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is reviewed de novo. State v. Williams, 2001 WI 21, ¶18, 241 Wis. 2d 631, 623 N.W.2d 106
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=661120 - 2023-05-25
is reviewed de novo. State v. Williams, 2001 WI 21, ¶18, 241 Wis. 2d 631, 623 N.W.2d 106
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=661120 - 2023-05-25
[PDF]
Delmar F. Renak v. Raymond G. Feest
there was no intent to make it a permanent fixture to the land. ¶5 We review decisions on summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18876 - 2017-09-21
there was no intent to make it a permanent fixture to the land. ¶5 We review decisions on summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18876 - 2017-09-21
Susan Schindelholz v. Joseph Vincenti
the application of a statute to a set of undisputed facts, and thus is subject to our de novo review. “Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7336 - 2005-03-31
the application of a statute to a set of undisputed facts, and thus is subject to our de novo review. “Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7336 - 2005-03-31
Elfriede Larson v. Tower Insurance Company, Inc.
an order granting summary judgment de novo using the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5283 - 2005-03-31
an order granting summary judgment de novo using the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5283 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Tews v. NHI, LLC, 2010 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70058 - 2014-09-15
of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Tews v. NHI, LLC, 2010 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70058 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Darice G. Griffin v. Ronald W. Griffin
to the facts is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2003 WI 50, ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6397 - 2017-09-19
to the facts is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2003 WI 50, ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6397 - 2017-09-19