Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28901 - 28910 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 28901 - 28910 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. There was testimony at trial that Schmucker told a police detective that he was seeking replacement pornography
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138974 - 2017-09-21
. There was testimony at trial that Schmucker told a police detective that he was seeking replacement pornography
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138974 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. §§ 942.09(2)(am)1. and 939.32, and disorderly conduct. There was testimony at trial that Schmucker told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138974 - 2015-04-07
. §§ 942.09(2)(am)1. and 939.32, and disorderly conduct. There was testimony at trial that Schmucker told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138974 - 2015-04-07
Jerry Saenz v. John Husz
of certiorari. The trial court dismissed the writ and Saenz appeals. Saenz contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8599 - 2005-03-31
of certiorari. The trial court dismissed the writ and Saenz appeals. Saenz contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8599 - 2005-03-31
Joseph P. Sepanek, Jr. v. M & I Bank of Burlington
, promissory estoppel, breach of good faith duty and breach of contract. The trial court granted summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11238 - 2005-03-31
, promissory estoppel, breach of good faith duty and breach of contract. The trial court granted summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11238 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Troy D. Moore
. Moore asserts the trial court No. 01-1737-CR 2 erroneously admitted character evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4124 - 2017-09-20
. Moore asserts the trial court No. 01-1737-CR 2 erroneously admitted character evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4124 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
charges were still pending trial, and he does not challenge that conviction on appeal. Wickman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448257 - 2021-11-02
charges were still pending trial, and he does not challenge that conviction on appeal. Wickman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448257 - 2021-11-02
COURT OF APPEALS
.”). ¶3 The divorce trial was held on March 3-4, 2011. At that time, Peter filed a second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99712 - 2013-07-23
.”). ¶3 The divorce trial was held on March 3-4, 2011. At that time, Peter filed a second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99712 - 2013-07-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
prejudicial. We conclude the trial court properly exercised its discretion and we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28733 - 2014-09-15
prejudicial. We conclude the trial court properly exercised its discretion and we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28733 - 2014-09-15
State v. Anthony W. Quattrochi
refusal was reasonable. In a related claim, he argues that he was prevented by the trial court from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13271 - 2005-03-31
refusal was reasonable. In a related claim, he argues that he was prevented by the trial court from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13271 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mary E. Winters
. EBERT, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 VERGERONT, J.1 The State of Wisconsin appeals an order of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3295 - 2017-09-19
. EBERT, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 VERGERONT, J.1 The State of Wisconsin appeals an order of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3295 - 2017-09-19