Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28911 - 28920 of 97757 for civil court case status online.
Search results 28911 - 28920 of 97757 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
of double jeopardy absent a showing of prosecutorial intent as defined in the case law, and the court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83136 - 2012-05-30
of double jeopardy absent a showing of prosecutorial intent as defined in the case law, and the court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83136 - 2012-05-30
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 7, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139074 - 2015-04-06
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 7, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139074 - 2015-04-06
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 26, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84078 - 2012-06-25
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 26, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84078 - 2012-06-25
COURT OF APPEALS
for case No. 2010AP563-CR. By an order dated April 29, 2010, this court determined that the notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63471 - 2012-02-19
for case No. 2010AP563-CR. By an order dated April 29, 2010, this court determined that the notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63471 - 2012-02-19
COURT OF APPEALS
improper. Singly or together, they do not make this an “exceptional case.” By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59410 - 2011-02-01
improper. Singly or together, they do not make this an “exceptional case.” By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59410 - 2011-02-01
COURT OF APPEALS
and an unpublished case of this court interpreting Bohling, Milewski established that she had a “reasonable objection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104909 - 2013-11-26
and an unpublished case of this court interpreting Bohling, Milewski established that she had a “reasonable objection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104909 - 2013-11-26
COURT OF APPEALS
to the incidents underlying the arrest in this case. The court determined there was nothing improper about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81562 - 2015-04-25
to the incidents underlying the arrest in this case. The court determined there was nothing improper about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81562 - 2015-04-25
CA Blank Order
if not previously paid or to revert to civil judgment.” However, the trial court imposed no such contingency
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101375 - 2013-08-22
if not previously paid or to revert to civil judgment.” However, the trial court imposed no such contingency
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101375 - 2013-08-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
for summary judgment. If the moving party made a prima facie case, the court examines the opposing party’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50288 - 2014-09-15
for summary judgment. If the moving party made a prima facie case, the court examines the opposing party’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50288 - 2014-09-15
Foremost Farms USA v. Shelly Zettler
went to weight rather than admissibility in this civil action. The court found that Foremost had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7050 - 2005-03-31
went to weight rather than admissibility in this civil action. The court found that Foremost had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7050 - 2005-03-31