Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28911 - 28920 of 74556 for public records.
Search results 28911 - 28920 of 74556 for public records.
State v. Reginald R. Carter
We conclude on the postconviction hearing record that Carter’s waiver was knowing and voluntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24868 - 2006-04-19
We conclude on the postconviction hearing record that Carter’s waiver was knowing and voluntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24868 - 2006-04-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The following facts are taken from the record and the suppression hearing transcript. ¶3 On December 31
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93377 - 2014-09-15
The following facts are taken from the record and the suppression hearing transcript. ¶3 On December 31
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93377 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. Applying that construction to the summary judgment record, we also conclude that there are no genuine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30126 - 2007-08-29
. Applying that construction to the summary judgment record, we also conclude that there are no genuine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30126 - 2007-08-29
Patricia K. Bernhardt v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
by any credible evidence in the record. On appeal, this court reviews the decisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10149 - 2005-03-31
by any credible evidence in the record. On appeal, this court reviews the decisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10149 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, and therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The following facts are taken from the record and the suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93377 - 2013-02-27
, and therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The following facts are taken from the record and the suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93377 - 2013-02-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) the prosecutor’s remarks during rebuttal were permissible in the context of the entire record; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99684 - 2014-09-15
) the prosecutor’s remarks during rebuttal were permissible in the context of the entire record; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99684 - 2014-09-15
Michael S. Elkins v. Gary McCaughtry
. For example, he states that the record “includes the Appellant’s first Complaint, which is clearly stamped
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5279 - 2005-03-31
. For example, he states that the record “includes the Appellant’s first Complaint, which is clearly stamped
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5279 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kevin L. C.
) disallowing evidence of a claimed prior untruthful sexual assault allegation by K.R. Because the record
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14738 - 2017-09-21
) disallowing evidence of a claimed prior untruthful sexual assault allegation by K.R. Because the record
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14738 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
business records into evidence. ¶9 “Affidavits in support of and in opposition to a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185905 - 2017-09-21
business records into evidence. ¶9 “Affidavits in support of and in opposition to a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185905 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Michael S. Elkins v. Gary McCaughtry
received by the CCE on April 6, 2001. For example, he states that the record “includes the Appellant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5279 - 2017-09-19
received by the CCE on April 6, 2001. For example, he states that the record “includes the Appellant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5279 - 2017-09-19