Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28921 - 28930 of 69114 for he.
Search results 28921 - 28930 of 69114 for he.
State v. Darryl H. Stegall
a judgment of conviction after he entered an Alford plea to one count of battery.[1] Stegall raises one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10843 - 2005-03-31
a judgment of conviction after he entered an Alford plea to one count of battery.[1] Stegall raises one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10843 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
a judgment imposing sentence after the revocation of Henden’s probation. Henden argues he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34044 - 2014-09-15
a judgment imposing sentence after the revocation of Henden’s probation. Henden argues he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34044 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2 ¶2 Attorney Jones was admitted to practice law in Wisconsin in August 1984. He
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176540 - 2017-09-21
2 ¶2 Attorney Jones was admitted to practice law in Wisconsin in August 1984. He
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176540 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
).[1] Donald contends the circuit court erred when concluding he lacked standing to bring an action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30325 - 2007-09-17
).[1] Donald contends the circuit court erred when concluding he lacked standing to bring an action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30325 - 2007-09-17
Jessie L. McShan v. Jerry E. Smith, Jr.
is whether McShan’s complaint states any causes of action that he should be allowed to pursue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4406 - 2005-03-31
is whether McShan’s complaint states any causes of action that he should be allowed to pursue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4406 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jessie L. McShan v. Jerry E. Smith, Jr.
members. The issue is whether McShan’s complaint states any causes of action that he should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4406 - 2017-09-19
members. The issue is whether McShan’s complaint states any causes of action that he should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4406 - 2017-09-19
State v. James Martindale
for postconviction relief. He argues that his sentence was unduly harsh and that the circuit court improperly denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21468 - 2006-02-20
for postconviction relief. He argues that his sentence was unduly harsh and that the circuit court improperly denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21468 - 2006-02-20
William N. Ledford v. Nancy Turcotte
open records request. Ledford petitioned for mandamus pro se, and lost in circuit court. He appealed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11324 - 2005-03-31
open records request. Ledford petitioned for mandamus pro se, and lost in circuit court. He appealed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11324 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lothar W. Penkert
for reconsideration.[1] He raises the following issues: (1) that he has an “inalienable right” to travel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11972 - 2005-03-31
for reconsideration.[1] He raises the following issues: (1) that he has an “inalienable right” to travel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11972 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. He alleges the existence of a new factor. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753660 - 2024-01-24
. He alleges the existence of a new factor. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753660 - 2024-01-24