Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28931 - 28940 of 33975 for dismissed.
Search results 28931 - 28940 of 33975 for dismissed.
State v. Andre D. Crockett
) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, which states that a judge may dismiss a successive petition when “new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3247 - 2005-03-31
) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, which states that a judge may dismiss a successive petition when “new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3247 - 2005-03-31
Graeme J. Paxton v. Vulcan Basement Waterproofing Company of Wisconsin, Inc.
also contends that the Paxtons’ cause of action under Wis. Stat. § 100.18 should have been dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15379 - 2005-03-31
also contends that the Paxtons’ cause of action under Wis. Stat. § 100.18 should have been dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15379 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
7 The Department asks us to dismiss J.M.J.’s appeal for her untimely filing of the notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242941 - 2019-06-27
7 The Department asks us to dismiss J.M.J.’s appeal for her untimely filing of the notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242941 - 2019-06-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
an objection or filing a motion to dismiss in the lower court. However, our supreme court has consistently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28296 - 2014-09-15
an objection or filing a motion to dismiss in the lower court. However, our supreme court has consistently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28296 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Dave Flores v. Jack Raz
granted Flores’ and Montoto’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed Raz’s counterclaim, concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3884 - 2017-09-20
granted Flores’ and Montoto’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed Raz’s counterclaim, concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3884 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
. The remaining counts in both cases were dismissed and read in at sentencing.[1] The court imposed the maximum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144355 - 2015-07-14
. The remaining counts in both cases were dismissed and read in at sentencing.[1] The court imposed the maximum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144355 - 2015-07-14
State v. Loren C. Alliet
but fewer than 2,500 grams of marijuana, with the intent to deliver, and the State agreed to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7179 - 2005-03-31
but fewer than 2,500 grams of marijuana, with the intent to deliver, and the State agreed to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7179 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
court was required to dismiss Derek’s petition because the form used was the incorrect form. Janice
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138490 - 2015-04-15
court was required to dismiss Derek’s petition because the form used was the incorrect form. Janice
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138490 - 2015-04-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is in the best interest of the child, termination and adoption or dismissal of the petition and pursuit of some
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958864 - 2025-05-20
is in the best interest of the child, termination and adoption or dismissal of the petition and pursuit of some
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958864 - 2025-05-20
Paul R. Sharpley, Jr. v. Paul R. Sharpley III
, dismissed a guardianship petition for Paul Sr. and presided over other actions involving one or more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4291 - 2005-03-31
, dismissed a guardianship petition for Paul Sr. and presided over other actions involving one or more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4291 - 2005-03-31