Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28931 - 28940 of 57293 for id.
Search results 28931 - 28940 of 57293 for id.
State v. Richard W. Foelker
is the primary and which is the alternate. See id.; see also Stary, 187 Wis.2d at 269, 522 N.W.2d at 34
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9540 - 2005-03-31
is the primary and which is the alternate. See id.; see also Stary, 187 Wis.2d at 269, 522 N.W.2d at 34
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9540 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
clearly erroneous. See id. The ultimate conclusion of whether counsel was ineffective is a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119619 - 2014-08-18
clearly erroneous. See id. The ultimate conclusion of whether counsel was ineffective is a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119619 - 2014-08-18
COURT OF APPEALS
a presumption that counsel’s challenged actions might constitute sound trial strategy. See id. at 689
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98789 - 2013-06-27
a presumption that counsel’s challenged actions might constitute sound trial strategy. See id. at 689
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98789 - 2013-06-27
Ashland County v. Lisa R.
by directing the taking of additional evidence. See id. II. New Trial ¶15 Alternatively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6823 - 2005-03-31
by directing the taking of additional evidence. See id. II. New Trial ¶15 Alternatively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6823 - 2005-03-31
State v. Olton Lee Dumas
, to determine whether the officers' acts were reasonable. Id. Whether a search made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10619 - 2005-03-31
, to determine whether the officers' acts were reasonable. Id. Whether a search made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10619 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ameritech Advanced Data Services of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
to an agency’s interpretation of a statute in particular circumstances, see id., none of those circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12527 - 2017-09-21
to an agency’s interpretation of a statute in particular circumstances, see id., none of those circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12527 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
is the informant? Id., ¶12 (citations omitted). Further, “[w]here reasonable inferences may be drawn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27139 - 2014-09-15
is the informant? Id., ¶12 (citations omitted). Further, “[w]here reasonable inferences may be drawn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27139 - 2014-09-15
Stephen G. Walker v. Monte B. Tobin
, but in the exercise of sound legal discretion, and each case must stand on its own peculiar merits. See id., (citing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10579 - 2005-03-31
, but in the exercise of sound legal discretion, and each case must stand on its own peculiar merits. See id., (citing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10579 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
consequences’ of a plea, by contrast, is not a prerequisite to entering a knowing and intelligent plea.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32438 - 2008-04-14
consequences’ of a plea, by contrast, is not a prerequisite to entering a knowing and intelligent plea.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32438 - 2008-04-14
COURT OF APPEALS
is final if it “disposes of the entire matter in litigation as to one or more of the parties.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36194 - 2009-04-15
is final if it “disposes of the entire matter in litigation as to one or more of the parties.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36194 - 2009-04-15