Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28951 - 28960 of 69120 for as he.
Search results 28951 - 28960 of 69120 for as he.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
, the potential penalties and the constitutional rights he waived by pleading no contest. Winarski personally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92170 - 2014-09-15
, the potential penalties and the constitutional rights he waived by pleading no contest. Winarski personally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92170 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994).[1] We conclude that Morris’s motion for relief from what he characterizes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48740 - 2010-04-05
, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994).[1] We conclude that Morris’s motion for relief from what he characterizes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48740 - 2010-04-05
State v. Steven R. Lineberry
beyond a reasonable doubt. Appellate counsel also noted Lineberry's complaint that he screamed because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8653 - 2005-03-31
beyond a reasonable doubt. Appellate counsel also noted Lineberry's complaint that he screamed because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8653 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Gerald Heckathorn
for possessing marijuana in excess of 2500 grams, with intent to deliver it. He also appeals an order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17824 - 2017-09-21
for possessing marijuana in excess of 2500 grams, with intent to deliver it. He also appeals an order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17824 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Richard C. Glesner
) in which he admitted to having engaged in professional misconduct by inflating two billings from his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17590 - 2017-09-21
) in which he admitted to having engaged in professional misconduct by inflating two billings from his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17590 - 2017-09-21
State v. Lothar W. Penkert
for reconsideration.[1] He raises the following issues: (1) that he has an “inalienable right” to travel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11972 - 2005-03-31
for reconsideration.[1] He raises the following issues: (1) that he has an “inalienable right” to travel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11972 - 2005-03-31
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Richard C. Glesner
(Board) in which he admitted to having engaged in professional misconduct by inflating two billings from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17590 - 2005-03-31
(Board) in which he admitted to having engaged in professional misconduct by inflating two billings from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17590 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark M. Loutsch
decision setting the restitution he must pay in this case at $33,167.44. The issue is whether the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6639 - 2005-03-31
decision setting the restitution he must pay in this case at $33,167.44. The issue is whether the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6639 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
conviction for second-degree sexual assault. He reported an address change on April 5, 2012, to the Sex
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104999 - 2013-12-02
conviction for second-degree sexual assault. He reported an address change on April 5, 2012, to the Sex
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104999 - 2013-12-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. He also was charged with three counts of intentionally contributing to the delinquency of a minor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233687 - 2019-01-30
. He also was charged with three counts of intentionally contributing to the delinquency of a minor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233687 - 2019-01-30