Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28951 - 28960 of 58542 for speedy trial.
Search results 28951 - 28960 of 58542 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Renee A. Fredel
, we uphold the trial court's findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9725 - 2017-09-19
, we uphold the trial court's findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9725 - 2017-09-19
Georgene A. Williams v. City of New Holstein
), appeal a judgment of the trial court in which the trial court found that Sohn was not acting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2616 - 2005-03-31
), appeal a judgment of the trial court in which the trial court found that Sohn was not acting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2616 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jerry Saenz v. John Husz
of certiorari. The trial court dismissed the writ and Saenz appeals. No. 95-0329 -2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8599 - 2017-09-19
of certiorari. The trial court dismissed the writ and Saenz appeals. No. 95-0329 -2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8599 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
an evidentiary hearing, at which Schleif and Reeves testified, the trial court denied Reeves’s suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35634 - 2014-09-15
an evidentiary hearing, at which Schleif and Reeves testified, the trial court denied Reeves’s suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35634 - 2014-09-15
State v. Christopher Bunch
sentence modification or resentencing. Bunch claims the trial court, in sentencing him, relied upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26110 - 2006-08-07
sentence modification or resentencing. Bunch claims the trial court, in sentencing him, relied upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26110 - 2006-08-07
COURT OF APPEALS
of the “strict no-contact order.” ¶5 A jury trial was ultimately set for September 10, 2007. O’Donnell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56794 - 2010-11-16
of the “strict no-contact order.” ¶5 A jury trial was ultimately set for September 10, 2007. O’Donnell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56794 - 2010-11-16
State v. Mark Sevelin
home because the home is not "property of another," and (2) the trial court should have credited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10531 - 2005-03-31
home because the home is not "property of another," and (2) the trial court should have credited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10531 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as a party to a crime; and possession of a firearm by a felon. Alexander seeks a new trial on the ground
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251187 - 2019-12-09
as a party to a crime; and possession of a firearm by a felon. Alexander seeks a new trial on the ground
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251187 - 2019-12-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they meant. ¶7 The trial court found that the State met its burden of proving that Reynolds understood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139720 - 2017-09-21
they meant. ¶7 The trial court found that the State met its burden of proving that Reynolds understood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139720 - 2017-09-21
State v. James E. Szulczewski
that defendant waived his constitutional challenge to § 940.20(1), Stats., by failing to raise it in the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10802 - 2005-03-31
that defendant waived his constitutional challenge to § 940.20(1), Stats., by failing to raise it in the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10802 - 2005-03-31