Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28961 - 28970 of 62338 for child support.
Search results 28961 - 28970 of 62338 for child support.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for a qualifying offense is supported by the evidence presented during the suppression hearing. Namely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256700 - 2020-03-17
for a qualifying offense is supported by the evidence presented during the suppression hearing. Namely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256700 - 2020-03-17
State v. Curtis W.Ross
of Detective Kaltenbrun’s testimony, that result would not have provided any support for Ross’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16126 - 2005-03-31
of Detective Kaltenbrun’s testimony, that result would not have provided any support for Ross’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16126 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Melinda Webber
brother was neither living with nor supporting his four children. Webber indicated that Beyah had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12734 - 2017-09-21
brother was neither living with nor supporting his four children. Webber indicated that Beyah had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12734 - 2017-09-21
Golden Rule Insurance Company v. Commissioner of Insurance
of fact if the agency’s finding is supported by substantial evidence in the record. Section 227.57(6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10101 - 2005-03-31
of fact if the agency’s finding is supported by substantial evidence in the record. Section 227.57(6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10101 - 2005-03-31
State v. William D. Taylor
), the defendant may support his or her argument with corroborating evidence when counsel is not available
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3823 - 2005-03-31
), the defendant may support his or her argument with corroborating evidence when counsel is not available
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3823 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Thomas R. Jorns v. The Town Board of the Town of Jacksonport
. 3 In his reply brief, Jorns argues that the Board’s conclusion was not supported by the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25994 - 2017-09-21
. 3 In his reply brief, Jorns argues that the Board’s conclusion was not supported by the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25994 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Karshra C. Armstrong
that there was no reasonable basis in the evidence to support an acquittal on the greater offense of attempted first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10023 - 2017-09-19
that there was no reasonable basis in the evidence to support an acquittal on the greater offense of attempted first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10023 - 2017-09-19
State v. Ralph Ovadal
findings are not supported by the evidence; (2) his conduct constituted speech protected by the First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6152 - 2005-03-31
findings are not supported by the evidence; (2) his conduct constituted speech protected by the First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6152 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to reject the no-merit report. 3 In support, the supplemental no-merit report asserts: While
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172251 - 2017-09-21
to reject the no-merit report. 3 In support, the supplemental no-merit report asserts: While
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172251 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confidential informants included in the report supported the allegations in the report. Kalafi challenged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1004235 - 2025-09-05
confidential informants included in the report supported the allegations in the report. Kalafi challenged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1004235 - 2025-09-05