Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28961 - 28970 of 30045 for de.

State v. Richard Dodson
is a question of constitutional fact which this court reviews de novo. See In Interest of Michael R.B., 175 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17113 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶30 As previously explained, custody for purposes of Miranda
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=330568 - 2021-03-22

[PDF] WI 134
is a question of law that we review de novo, applying the well- recognized standards used by the circuit court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57779 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
conduct constitutes ineffective assistance is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=774069 - 2024-03-12

Madison Teachers, Inc. v. Madison Metropolitan School District
. We review de novo a circuit court's interpretation of a statute. State v. Phillips, 172 Wis.2d 391
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7739 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Timothy Scott Bailey Smith, Sr.
determination of the statutory elements of a crime is a question of law, our review is de novo. State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18884 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI 61
reviews de novo whether the facts meet the constitutional standard of reasonable suspicion. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83581 - 2014-09-15

Frontsheet
interpretation, our review is de novo. McNeil v. Hansen, 2007 WI 56, ¶6, 300 Wis. 2d 358, 731 N.W.2d 273
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56880 - 2010-11-16

[PDF] WI 130
" for the purposes of that statute.17 As this is a question of statutory interpretation, our review is de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56880 - 2014-09-15

Thomas Strasser v. Transtech Mobile Fleet Service, Inc.
of Restatement (Second) of Torts § 388 (1965). See Westphal v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours, 192 Wis. 2d 347, 365
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17407 - 2005-03-31