Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28971 - 28980 of 29957 for de.
Search results 28971 - 28980 of 29957 for de.
Heritage Mutual Insurance Company v. William E. Larsen
decisions de novo. Nevertheless, under the great weight deference standard of review, a reviewing court may
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17465 - 2005-03-31
decisions de novo. Nevertheless, under the great weight deference standard of review, a reviewing court may
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17465 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
verdict presents a legal question that we review de novo. State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040263 - 2025-12-17
verdict presents a legal question that we review de novo. State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040263 - 2025-12-17
[PDF]
Frontsheet
interpretation. We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Forrett, 2022 WI 37, ¶5
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=818270 - 2024-09-09
interpretation. We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Forrett, 2022 WI 37, ¶5
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=818270 - 2024-09-09
Frontsheet
rel. Lyons v. De Valk, 47 Wis. 2d 200, 205, 177 N.W.2d 106 (1970). The United States Supreme Court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116726 - 2013-07-23
rel. Lyons v. De Valk, 47 Wis. 2d 200, 205, 177 N.W.2d 106 (1970). The United States Supreme Court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116726 - 2013-07-23
State v. Jay D. Krajewski
Constitution. This is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Bohling, 173 Wis. 2d at 533. III
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17577 - 2009-02-19
Constitution. This is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Bohling, 173 Wis. 2d at 533. III
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17577 - 2009-02-19
State v. Glenn F. Schwebke
of the statute. Interpretation of a statute is a question of law that we may decide de novo. Douglas D., 2001
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17580 - 2009-02-19
of the statute. Interpretation of a statute is a question of law that we may decide de novo. Douglas D., 2001
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17580 - 2009-02-19
[PDF]
Dennis J. Flynn v. Department of Administration; Mark D. Bugher
, and correctly so, that this court’s review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17180 - 2017-09-21
, and correctly so, that this court’s review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17180 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
questions of law we review de novo. Miller v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 219 Wis. 2d 250, 259, 580 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=331703 - 2021-02-02
questions of law we review de novo. Miller v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 219 Wis. 2d 250, 259, 580 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=331703 - 2021-02-02
[PDF]
State v. Glenn F. Schwebke
that we may decide de novo. Douglas D., 2001 WI 47, ¶14. Our goal in interpreting a statute
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17580 - 2017-09-21
that we may decide de novo. Douglas D., 2001 WI 47, ¶14. Our goal in interpreting a statute
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17580 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jerry Lu Epstein v. John T. Benson
” or “de novo.” The great weight standard is the highest degree of deference. It is applied when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15548 - 2017-09-21
” or “de novo.” The great weight standard is the highest degree of deference. It is applied when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15548 - 2017-09-21