Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28971 - 28980 of 44407 for name change.
Search results 28971 - 28980 of 44407 for name change.
Mary C. Behrndt v. Patrick Behrndt
was a named party to the litigation and did not file any answer or other responsive pleading; b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2772 - 2005-03-31
was a named party to the litigation and did not file any answer or other responsive pleading; b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2772 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
reasoned it could not consider the hearsay documents because they related to an essential finding, namely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85609 - 2012-07-30
reasoned it could not consider the hearsay documents because they related to an essential finding, namely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85609 - 2012-07-30
[PDF]
Supreme Court Statistics April 2025
in April. Information about issued opinions, including the Court’s disposition and the names
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=954913 - 2025-05-08
in April. Information about issued opinions, including the Court’s disposition and the names
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=954913 - 2025-05-08
[PDF]
State v. Mark David Hayter
would be. Nor does Hayter now name any specific witness whose appearance at trial was a surprise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6040 - 2017-09-19
would be. Nor does Hayter now name any specific witness whose appearance at trial was a surprise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6040 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
names interchangeably when referring to Escalona’s procedural bar, or Tillman’s procedural bar. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35937 - 2009-03-23
names interchangeably when referring to Escalona’s procedural bar, or Tillman’s procedural bar. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35937 - 2009-03-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
name [on the form].” ¶11 The court found that Smith’s probation agent told him that revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57415 - 2014-09-15
name [on the form].” ¶11 The court found that Smith’s probation agent told him that revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57415 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Keith Griffin
with probable cause, ... as the very name implies, we deal with probabilities. These are not technical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6430 - 2017-09-19
with probable cause, ... as the very name implies, we deal with probabilities. These are not technical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6430 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
Larson concedes satisfaction with the first factor, namely, the identity of the parties is the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46416 - 2014-09-15
Larson concedes satisfaction with the first factor, namely, the identity of the parties is the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46416 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Earl DeWayne Phiffer
, and that there was nothing in the record to suggest any reason why she would falsely name Phiffer as the father. Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19282 - 2017-09-21
, and that there was nothing in the record to suggest any reason why she would falsely name Phiffer as the father. Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19282 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Ringer
, Ringer’s name was not among those four. Approximately one week later, another informant contacted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11596 - 2017-09-19
, Ringer’s name was not among those four. Approximately one week later, another informant contacted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11596 - 2017-09-19