Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28981 - 28990 of 58506 for speedy trial.

State v. Donald J. Van Ryzin
. Donald J. Van Ryzin appeals his conviction for operating while intoxicated on grounds that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14431 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Rodosbaldo Pozo v. Sheriff Karl Halverson
. This court affirms the trial court’s dismissal because Pozo failed to comply with the notice of claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12268 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Feliciano T. Douglas
during his trial. We affirm. No. 02-3383-CR 2 ¶2 A police informant bought drugs from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5997 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] James Annoye v. The Yacht Club at Sister Bay Condominium Association, Inc.
, the trial court held that the condo merger was valid and granted the summary judgment motions filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18752 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
voluntary. A three-day jury trial was held. Harris testified at the trial and presented an intoxication
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136994 - 2017-09-21

State v. Mark G. Bargenquast
to § 346.63(1)(a), Stats. He contests the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress blood alcohol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14543 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Eddie L. Johnikin
in the plea negotiations leading to his no- contest plea and that his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18695 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Bobbie Torry
of conviction. He raises a number of issues related to his trial. We affirm. ¶2 A jury found Torry guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5968 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and PAC, first offenses. After an unsuccessful motion to suppress, the case proceeded to a bench trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213812 - 2018-06-06

State v. James A. Albright
of conviction. DISCUSSION ¶5 We will uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4382 - 2005-03-31