Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28991 - 29000 of 62338 for child support.
Search results 28991 - 29000 of 62338 for child support.
[PDF]
State v. Karshra C. Armstrong
that there was no reasonable basis in the evidence to support an acquittal on the greater offense of attempted first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10023 - 2017-09-19
that there was no reasonable basis in the evidence to support an acquittal on the greater offense of attempted first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10023 - 2017-09-19
State v. Ralph Ovadal
findings are not supported by the evidence; (2) his conduct constituted speech protected by the First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6152 - 2005-03-31
findings are not supported by the evidence; (2) his conduct constituted speech protected by the First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6152 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to reject the no-merit report. 3 In support, the supplemental no-merit report asserts: While
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172251 - 2017-09-21
to reject the no-merit report. 3 In support, the supplemental no-merit report asserts: While
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172251 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Charles Schroeder v. Linda Wacker
. § 811.02. In support of his request, he executed an affidavit in which he stated, 4. I have personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2130 - 2017-09-19
. § 811.02. In support of his request, he executed an affidavit in which he stated, 4. I have personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2130 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confidential informants included in the report supported the allegations in the report. Kalafi challenged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1004235 - 2025-09-05
confidential informants included in the report supported the allegations in the report. Kalafi challenged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1004235 - 2025-09-05
Thomas R. Jorns v. The Town Board of the Town of Jacksonport
support the Board’s arguments: NOTE: The definition of “advantages” in s. 82.27(1) is new. Under current
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25994 - 2006-07-24
support the Board’s arguments: NOTE: The definition of “advantages” in s. 82.27(1) is new. Under current
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25994 - 2006-07-24
[PDF]
Michael A. Downey v. John P. Kendall
as not supported by the evidence. We reject his claims and affirm that portion of the judgment denying him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9436 - 2017-09-19
as not supported by the evidence. We reject his claims and affirm that portion of the judgment denying him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9436 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and dismissed her claim. The circuit court determined that Gladney needed an expert witness to support her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=666528 - 2023-06-13
and dismissed her claim. The circuit court determined that Gladney needed an expert witness to support her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=666528 - 2023-06-13
[PDF]
State v. Karshra C. Armstrong
that there was no reasonable basis in the evidence to support an acquittal on the greater offense of attempted first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10024 - 2017-09-19
that there was no reasonable basis in the evidence to support an acquittal on the greater offense of attempted first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10024 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
whether there would be arguable merit to a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence to support
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185720 - 2017-09-21
whether there would be arguable merit to a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence to support
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185720 - 2017-09-21