Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28991 - 29000 of 97694 for civil court case status online.
Search results 28991 - 29000 of 97694 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
acknowledged that Mohr and State v. Kyles, 2004 WI 15, 269 Wis. 2d 1, 675 N.W.2d 449—two cases in which courts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33426 - 2008-07-16
acknowledged that Mohr and State v. Kyles, 2004 WI 15, 269 Wis. 2d 1, 675 N.W.2d 449—two cases in which courts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33426 - 2008-07-16
COURT OF APPEALS
) (court in this context to “consider the totality of circumstances as they exist in each case”). ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62519 - 2011-04-06
) (court in this context to “consider the totality of circumstances as they exist in each case”). ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62519 - 2011-04-06
COURT OF APPEALS
permit the procedure utilized by the circuit court in this case.[6] However, we need not resolve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39668 - 2009-08-17
permit the procedure utilized by the circuit court in this case.[6] However, we need not resolve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39668 - 2009-08-17
COURT OF APPEALS
On August 26, 2008, at the fifth initial appearance, the court reviewed what had transpired in the case up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41864 - 2009-10-05
On August 26, 2008, at the fifth initial appearance, the court reviewed what had transpired in the case up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41864 - 2009-10-05
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶16 In this case, the trial court failed to specifically address three of the six Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32436 - 2008-04-14
. ¶16 In this case, the trial court failed to specifically address three of the six Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32436 - 2008-04-14
COURT OF APPEALS
not be the case.’”) (citation and one set of internal quotation marks omitted). As our supreme court declared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33044 - 2008-06-16
not be the case.’”) (citation and one set of internal quotation marks omitted). As our supreme court declared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33044 - 2008-06-16
COURT OF APPEALS
from the trial transcript in this case. Before trial, the court granted a motion to exclude evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49214 - 2010-04-21
from the trial transcript in this case. Before trial, the court granted a motion to exclude evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49214 - 2010-04-21
COURT OF APPEALS
relied on the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, as well as a case from the District of Columbia Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60262 - 2011-02-22
relied on the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, as well as a case from the District of Columbia Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60262 - 2011-02-22
COURT OF APPEALS
Prior to trial, the court divided the case into three phases. Phase one was on liability and would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141374 - 2015-05-12
Prior to trial, the court divided the case into three phases. Phase one was on liability and would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141374 - 2015-05-12
COURT OF APPEALS
45 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2008AP496 Complete Title of Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35945 - 2009-05-11
45 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2008AP496 Complete Title of Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35945 - 2009-05-11