Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28991 - 29000 of 46074 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 28991 - 29000 of 46074 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
NOTICE
, Brian and Lewandowski. Brian, who works at the hardware store, was expected to testify that he saw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36591 - 2014-09-15
, Brian and Lewandowski. Brian, who works at the hardware store, was expected to testify that he saw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36591 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
testified: David, Brian and Lewandowski. Brian, who works at the hardware store, was expected to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36591 - 2009-05-26
testified: David, Brian and Lewandowski. Brian, who works at the hardware store, was expected to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36591 - 2009-05-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(citation omitted). No. 2019AP1022-CR 6 ¶10 Our custody analysis is an “objective test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=891296 - 2024-12-17
(citation omitted). No. 2019AP1022-CR 6 ¶10 Our custody analysis is an “objective test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=891296 - 2024-12-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and is entitled to a CUP.” This argument misapprehends our standard of review. The substantial evidence test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167923 - 2017-09-21
and is entitled to a CUP.” This argument misapprehends our standard of review. The substantial evidence test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167923 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 52
, the State called five witnesses—three law enforcement officers, a confidential informant who worked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244635 - 2020-01-07
, the State called five witnesses—three law enforcement officers, a confidential informant who worked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244635 - 2020-01-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was at work, O’Toole, clad only in his underpants, would sexually assault her in his bed. The sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301598 - 2020-11-04
was at work, O’Toole, clad only in his underpants, would sexually assault her in his bed. The sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301598 - 2020-11-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. As part of the motion, the County submitted the affidavits of the social worker assigned to work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=586201 - 2022-11-03
. As part of the motion, the County submitted the affidavits of the social worker assigned to work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=586201 - 2022-11-03
COURT OF APPEALS
was ineffective, we apply a two-part test: To prevail on an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86161 - 2012-08-15
was ineffective, we apply a two-part test: To prevail on an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86161 - 2012-08-15
State v. Emmett White
The familiar two-pronged test for ineffective assistance of counsel claims is found in Strickland v. Washington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10472 - 2005-03-31
The familiar two-pronged test for ineffective assistance of counsel claims is found in Strickland v. Washington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10472 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
the Whites to test their interpretation in court. They obliged. Their complaint sought: (1
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234018 - 2019-02-27
the Whites to test their interpretation in court. They obliged. Their complaint sought: (1
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234018 - 2019-02-27