Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28991 - 29000 of 58285 for speedy trial.

96 CV 1749 William A. Pangman v. Richard William King
De Chambeau Trial Court Judge City-County Bldg. 210 Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd. Madison, WI 53709
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14076 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
.1 The trial court imposed a four-year sentence for the battery to run concurrent to a previously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27774 - 2014-09-15

State v. Frank Anastasi
to provide exculpatory information and that trial counsel performed ineffectively by failing to raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7441 - 2005-03-31

Joan Solie v. Employee Trust Funds Board
Group members. The trial court held that Solie and Baxter were inappropriately placed in the Formula
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1248 - 2004-03-22

[PDF] James Zielinski v. Keith Govier
, and to Platteville Township. We conclude, as did the trial court, that the Zielinskis initiated and maintained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14613 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. David L. Wiener
argues that his trial counsel was ineffective because he failed to present evidence that the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9170 - 2017-09-19

Gentek Building Products, Inc. v. Arnold Check
. Check moved the trial court for summary judgment, contending that his commissions held by Richards were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14090 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
obtained prescription. A one-day jury trial was held on all charges. ΒΆ3 At trial, a confidential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70353 - 2014-09-15

State v. John R. Martin
entered and whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when imposing sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11310 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] James Annoye v. The Yacht Club at Sister Bay Condominium Association, Inc.
, the trial court held that the condo merger was valid and granted the summary judgment motions filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18752 - 2017-09-21