Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 291 - 300 of 63677 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 291 - 300 of 63677 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court ultimately awarded the parties joint custody, but determined the children would attend school
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186450 - 2017-09-21
court ultimately awarded the parties joint custody, but determined the children would attend school
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186450 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
postconviction motion for a new trial. He argues that trial counsel was ineffective for not moving to sever
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29288 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion for a new trial. He argues that trial counsel was ineffective for not moving to sever
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29288 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to the crime of attempted armed robbery. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29288 - 2007-06-05
to the crime of attempted armed robbery. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29288 - 2007-06-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
custody, he filed a motion to hold Miller in contempt for not abiding by the placement agreement. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57153 - 2014-09-15
custody, he filed a motion to hold Miller in contempt for not abiding by the placement agreement. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57153 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and testified for the State at Wold’s and Johnson’s joint trial. The jury found both guilty. Wold’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131995 - 2014-12-22
and testified for the State at Wold’s and Johnson’s joint trial. The jury found both guilty. Wold’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131995 - 2014-12-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
contends that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to sever his and his codefendants’ joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131995 - 2017-09-21
contends that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to sever his and his codefendants’ joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131995 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Wendy S. Zeka v. Gary R. Zeka
$66,000 annually. ¶3 The trial court accepted the parties’ stipulation and awarded joint custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3204 - 2017-09-19
$66,000 annually. ¶3 The trial court accepted the parties’ stipulation and awarded joint custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3204 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Shawn Michael D. v. Tracy K.
found that joint custody was not feasible due to Tracy’s interference with Shawn’s legitimate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12269 - 2017-09-21
found that joint custody was not feasible due to Tracy’s interference with Shawn’s legitimate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12269 - 2017-09-21
Shawn Michael D. v. Tracy K.
custody to Shawn. The trial court found that joint custody was not feasible due to Tracy’s interference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12269 - 2005-03-31
custody to Shawn. The trial court found that joint custody was not feasible due to Tracy’s interference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12269 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Larry J. Copus
motion, Copus was not “in custody” under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12720 - 2017-09-21
motion, Copus was not “in custody” under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12720 - 2017-09-21