Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 291 - 300 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 291 - 300 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
Shawn Michael D. v. Tracy K.
found that joint custody was not feasible due to Tracy’s interference with Shawn’s legitimate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12269 - 2017-09-21
found that joint custody was not feasible due to Tracy’s interference with Shawn’s legitimate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12269 - 2017-09-21
Shawn Michael D. v. Tracy K.
custody to Shawn. The trial court found that joint custody was not feasible due to Tracy’s interference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12269 - 2005-03-31
custody to Shawn. The trial court found that joint custody was not feasible due to Tracy’s interference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12269 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Larry J. Copus
motion, Copus was not “in custody” under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12720 - 2017-09-21
motion, Copus was not “in custody” under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12720 - 2017-09-21
State v. Larry J. Copus
. EICH, C.J.[1] Larry Copus appeals from an order dismissing his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12719 - 2005-03-31
. EICH, C.J.[1] Larry Copus appeals from an order dismissing his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12719 - 2005-03-31
State v. Larry J. Copus
. EICH, C.J.[1] Larry Copus appeals from an order dismissing his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12720 - 2005-03-31
. EICH, C.J.[1] Larry Copus appeals from an order dismissing his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12720 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Larry J. Copus
motion, Copus was not “in custody” under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12719 - 2017-09-21
motion, Copus was not “in custody” under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12719 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Wendy S. Zeka v. Gary R. Zeka
$66,000 annually. ¶3 The trial court accepted the parties’ stipulation and awarded joint custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3204 - 2017-09-19
$66,000 annually. ¶3 The trial court accepted the parties’ stipulation and awarded joint custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3204 - 2017-09-19
Tina Marie Olson v. Bruce Alan Olson
parties shall be awarded joint legal custody of their minor children" and listing all the children born
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14013 - 2005-03-31
parties shall be awarded joint legal custody of their minor children" and listing all the children born
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14013 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Tina Marie Olson v. Bruce Alan Olson
settlement agreement, stipulating that "[t]he parties shall be awarded joint legal custody of their minor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14013 - 2014-09-15
settlement agreement, stipulating that "[t]he parties shall be awarded joint legal custody of their minor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14013 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
remained in custody until a joint sentencing hearing was held on both cases. However, as we discuss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164060 - 2017-09-21
remained in custody until a joint sentencing hearing was held on both cases. However, as we discuss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164060 - 2017-09-21