Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 291 - 300 of 83435 for case code.
Search results 291 - 300 of 83435 for case code.
Circuit court eFiling - Common required filing documents – Wisconsin Court System eFile Support
that this is not an all encompassing list. The filing document required for your case type and classification code may
/hc/en-us/articles/25177238495885-Circuit-court-eFiling-Common-required-filing-documents
that this is not an all encompassing list. The filing document required for your case type and classification code may
/hc/en-us/articles/25177238495885-Circuit-court-eFiling-Common-required-filing-documents
COURT OF APPEALS
Restoration breached Wis. Admin. Code ch. ATCP 100 (June 2011) (the home improvement code), and postverdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90612 - 2012-12-12
Restoration breached Wis. Admin. Code ch. ATCP 100 (June 2011) (the home improvement code), and postverdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90612 - 2012-12-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
their contract with one another, and EA Restoration breached WIS. ADMIN. CODE ch. No. 2011AP2855 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90612 - 2014-09-15
their contract with one another, and EA Restoration breached WIS. ADMIN. CODE ch. No. 2011AP2855 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90612 - 2014-09-15
Eugene Harris v. Judy Smith
. By the Court.—Order affirmed. [1] See Wis. Adm. Code § DOC 302.18. [2] Even if we addressed this case under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12808 - 2005-03-31
. By the Court.—Order affirmed. [1] See Wis. Adm. Code § DOC 302.18. [2] Even if we addressed this case under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12808 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Eugene Harris v. Judy Smith
, according to the record in this case, he failed to appeal the violation report pursuant to WIS. ADM. CODE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12808 - 2017-09-21
, according to the record in this case, he failed to appeal the violation report pursuant to WIS. ADM. CODE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12808 - 2017-09-21
Lorell E. Smith v. Westwood Estates, Inc.
on the meaning of the building code and in not ruling that Westwood had, as a matter of law, violated certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11978 - 2005-03-31
on the meaning of the building code and in not ruling that Westwood had, as a matter of law, violated certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11978 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lorell E. Smith v. Westwood Estates, Inc.
of the building code and in not ruling that Westwood had, as a matter of law, violated certain code requirements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11978 - 2017-09-21
of the building code and in not ruling that Westwood had, as a matter of law, violated certain code requirements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11978 - 2017-09-21
2007 WI APP 21
in violation of Wis. Admin. Code § PSY 5.01(14). Most relevant to Bar-Av’s case is § PSY 5.01(14)(c), which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27904 - 2007-02-27
in violation of Wis. Admin. Code § PSY 5.01(14). Most relevant to Bar-Av’s case is § PSY 5.01(14)(c), which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27904 - 2007-02-27
[PDF]
WI APP 21
2007 WI APP 21 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2004AP3251
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27904 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI APP 21 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2004AP3251
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27904 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Wisconsin Judicial Commission v. Douglas R. Stern
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-0622-J Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17222 - 2017-09-21
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-0622-J Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17222 - 2017-09-21