Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 291 - 300 of 26439 for marital settlement agreement/1000.
Search results 291 - 300 of 26439 for marital settlement agreement/1000.
Michelle Elizabeth Bernier v. Michel Carey Bernier
a Partial Marital Settlement Agreement providing that Vangelos could remove the parties’ two children from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20644 - 2006-01-24
a Partial Marital Settlement Agreement providing that Vangelos could remove the parties’ two children from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20644 - 2006-01-24
[PDF]
Michelle Elizabeth Bernier v. Michel Carey Bernier
to reside with her in California. The Partial Marital Settlement Agreement also, among other child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20644 - 2017-09-21
to reside with her in California. The Partial Marital Settlement Agreement also, among other child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20644 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
ordered that, pursuant to the marital settlement agreement, Peter pay Josephine $23,915.61 for a bill
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141514 - 2017-09-21
ordered that, pursuant to the marital settlement agreement, Peter pay Josephine $23,915.61 for a bill
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141514 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Richard Pierce v. Gary Norwick
of $1000 should have been doubled pursuant to § 100.20(5), STATS., prior to calculating the offset
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10216 - 2017-09-20
of $1000 should have been doubled pursuant to § 100.20(5), STATS., prior to calculating the offset
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10216 - 2017-09-20
Richard Pierce v. Gary Norwick
. On appeal, the Pierces make the following claims: (1) the jury's award of damages in the amount of $1000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10216 - 2005-03-31
. On appeal, the Pierces make the following claims: (1) the jury's award of damages in the amount of $1000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10216 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
reached a partial marital settlement agreement, but disputed the equalization payment due upon division
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58827 - 2011-01-12
reached a partial marital settlement agreement, but disputed the equalization payment due upon division
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58827 - 2011-01-12
Elaine C. Socha v. James Socha
pursuant to § 766.53, Stats. (gift of marital property to third persons may not aggregate more than $1000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9202 - 2005-03-31
pursuant to § 766.53, Stats. (gift of marital property to third persons may not aggregate more than $1000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9202 - 2005-03-31
Jane A. Patrickus v. Robert Patrickus
$109,000. At the time of their divorce, Jane and Robert entered into a comprehensive marital settlement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16329 - 2005-03-31
$109,000. At the time of their divorce, Jane and Robert entered into a comprehensive marital settlement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16329 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was not unforeseen. The court found that, when the marital settlement agreement was negotiated and approved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243442 - 2019-07-11
was not unforeseen. The court found that, when the marital settlement agreement was negotiated and approved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243442 - 2019-07-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
matter. Schiller challenges the circuit court’s interpretation of a marital settlement agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=348676 - 2021-03-25
matter. Schiller challenges the circuit court’s interpretation of a marital settlement agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=348676 - 2021-03-25