Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 291 - 300 of 60091 for quit claim deed/1000.

[PDF] Lou Krepel v. Esther Darnell
it to their daughter, Edna Fassbinder. Id. This is the lot now owned by the Krepels. Id. The deed from the Ingalls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9230 - 2017-09-19

Robert Kucharski v. Andrew L. Kucharski, Jr.
in common. It is this deed that provides the basis for Robert’s claim of a one-eighth legal interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3133 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Robert Kucharski v. Andrew L. Kucharski, Jr.
. It is this deed that provides the basis for Robert’s claim of a one-eighth legal interest in the disputed lots
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3133 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] George Dufield v. Tom McCormick
of the existence and location of the easement. He alternatively claims he established exclusive ownership
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7478 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] James T. Fritz v. Mary D. Fritz
financial obligations by quitting his high- paying job and accepting a much lower salary right before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13692 - 2014-09-15

James T. Fritz v. Mary D. Fritz
by quitting his high-paying job and accepting a much lower salary right before the court was to determine how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13692 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] John L. Yost v. State of Wisconsin Dept. of Transportation
court. WARRANTY DEED CLAIM The Yosts' second claim alleges the DOT failed to comply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9562 - 2017-09-19

John L. Yost v. State of Wisconsin Dept. of Transportation
argue their claim that DOT breached the agreement in the warranty deed should not have been dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9562 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 24, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
under a prescriptive easement or under the 1949 deed. Finally, we reject the Lautenbachs’ claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26890 - 2006-10-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of WLH. The Town claims the circuit No. 2015AP700 2 court erred in finding that the Town
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160442 - 2017-09-21