Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 291 - 300 of 60098 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 291 - 300 of 60098 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
Robert Kucharski v. Andrew L. Kucharski, Jr.
. It is this deed that provides the basis for Robert’s claim of a one-eighth legal interest in the disputed lots
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3133 - 2017-09-19
. It is this deed that provides the basis for Robert’s claim of a one-eighth legal interest in the disputed lots
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3133 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of land (the “Barber parcel”), and the deed for that parcel conveys an easement for ingress and egress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=536142 - 2022-06-23
of land (the “Barber parcel”), and the deed for that parcel conveys an easement for ingress and egress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=536142 - 2022-06-23
[PDF]
George Dufield v. Tom McCormick
of the existence and location of the easement. He alternatively claims he established exclusive ownership
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7478 - 2017-09-20
of the existence and location of the easement. He alternatively claims he established exclusive ownership
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7478 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
John L. Yost v. State of Wisconsin Dept. of Transportation
court. WARRANTY DEED CLAIM The Yosts' second claim alleges the DOT failed to comply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9562 - 2017-09-19
court. WARRANTY DEED CLAIM The Yosts' second claim alleges the DOT failed to comply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9562 - 2017-09-19
John L. Yost v. State of Wisconsin Dept. of Transportation
argue their claim that DOT breached the agreement in the warranty deed should not have been dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9562 - 2005-03-31
argue their claim that DOT breached the agreement in the warranty deed should not have been dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9562 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 24, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
under a prescriptive easement or under the 1949 deed. Finally, we reject the Lautenbachs’ claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26890 - 2006-10-23
under a prescriptive easement or under the 1949 deed. Finally, we reject the Lautenbachs’ claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26890 - 2006-10-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of WLH. The Town claims the circuit No. 2015AP700 2 court erred in finding that the Town
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160442 - 2017-09-21
of WLH. The Town claims the circuit No. 2015AP700 2 court erred in finding that the Town
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160442 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Lawson Bender v. Karmen Lindhal
claim against the estate, voiding a quitclaim deed executed by Lindhal with regard to the single-family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8396 - 2017-09-19
claim against the estate, voiding a quitclaim deed executed by Lindhal with regard to the single-family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8396 - 2017-09-19
2007 WI APP 112
claims, we uphold the circuit court’s holding that the restriction was well defined in the relevant deeds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28426 - 2007-04-26
claims, we uphold the circuit court’s holding that the restriction was well defined in the relevant deeds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28426 - 2007-04-26
[PDF]
WI APP 271
of extended supervision and a fine of $1000. ¶3 The record is devoid of any information about Ramel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30876 - 2014-09-15
of extended supervision and a fine of $1000. ¶3 The record is devoid of any information about Ramel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30876 - 2014-09-15