Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 291 - 300 of 60982 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 291 - 300 of 60982 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-day trial featuring experts opining on deeds and surveys, childhood stories of what the area looked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177794 - 2017-09-21
-day trial featuring experts opining on deeds and surveys, childhood stories of what the area looked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177794 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of land (the “Barber parcel”), and the deed for that parcel conveys an easement for ingress and egress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=536142 - 2022-06-23
of land (the “Barber parcel”), and the deed for that parcel conveys an easement for ingress and egress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=536142 - 2022-06-23
[PDF]
Lou Krepel v. Esther Darnell
it to their daughter, Edna Fassbinder. Id. This is the lot now owned by the Krepels. Id. The deed from the Ingalls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9230 - 2017-09-19
it to their daughter, Edna Fassbinder. Id. This is the lot now owned by the Krepels. Id. The deed from the Ingalls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9230 - 2017-09-19
Lou Krepel v. Esther Darnell
' easement claim appears in their chain of title by virtue of the 1952 corrective deed from Fassbinder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9230 - 2005-03-31
' easement claim appears in their chain of title by virtue of the 1952 corrective deed from Fassbinder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9230 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert Kucharski v. Andrew L. Kucharski, Jr.
. It is this deed that provides the basis for Robert’s claim of a one-eighth legal interest in the disputed lots
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3133 - 2017-09-19
. It is this deed that provides the basis for Robert’s claim of a one-eighth legal interest in the disputed lots
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3133 - 2017-09-19
Robert Kucharski v. Andrew L. Kucharski, Jr.
in common. It is this deed that provides the basis for Robert’s claim of a one-eighth legal interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3133 - 2005-03-31
in common. It is this deed that provides the basis for Robert’s claim of a one-eighth legal interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3133 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 271
of extended supervision and a fine of $1000. ¶3 The record is devoid of any information about Ramel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30876 - 2014-09-15
of extended supervision and a fine of $1000. ¶3 The record is devoid of any information about Ramel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30876 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
George Dufield v. Tom McCormick
of the existence and location of the easement. He alternatively claims he established exclusive ownership
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7478 - 2017-09-20
of the existence and location of the easement. He alternatively claims he established exclusive ownership
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7478 - 2017-09-20
John L. Yost v. State of Wisconsin Dept. of Transportation
argue their claim that DOT breached the agreement in the warranty deed should not have been dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9562 - 2005-03-31
argue their claim that DOT breached the agreement in the warranty deed should not have been dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9562 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
John L. Yost v. State of Wisconsin Dept. of Transportation
court. WARRANTY DEED CLAIM The Yosts' second claim alleges the DOT failed to comply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9562 - 2017-09-19
court. WARRANTY DEED CLAIM The Yosts' second claim alleges the DOT failed to comply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9562 - 2017-09-19