Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 291 - 300 of 1245 for syke.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the circumstances test. See State v. Sykes, 2005 WI 48, ¶18, 279 Wis. No. 2015AP1010 5 2d 742, 695
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159431 - 2017-09-21

State v. Deryl B. Beyer
was not appropriate for an individual deemed dangerous under ch. 980. The lead opinion, written by Justice Sykes
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20877 - 2007-05-23

[PDF] State v. Hayes Johnson
JUDGE: Diane S. Sykes JUSTICES: Concurred: Dissented: ABRAHAMSON, C.J. dissents
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17259 - 2017-09-21

Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed. ¶1 DIANE S. SYKES, J. Circuit courts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16768 - 2005-03-31

Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed. ¶1 DIANE S. SYKES, J. Circuit courts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16750 - 2005-03-31

Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed. ¶1 DIANE S. SYKES, J. Circuit courts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16738 - 2005-03-31

Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed. ¶1 DIANE S. SYKES, J. Circuit courts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16764 - 2005-03-31

Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed. ¶1 DIANE S. SYKES, J. Circuit courts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16734 - 2005-03-31

Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed. ¶1 DIANE S. SYKES, J. Circuit courts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16748 - 2005-03-31

Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed. ¶1 DIANE S. SYKES, J. Circuit courts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16744 - 2005-03-31