Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 291 - 300 of 7642 for yes.
Search results 291 - 300 of 7642 for yes.
[PDF]
Richard Bouchette v. Catherine Spatola
in the following colloquy: Q Does that photograph reflect the front of Ms. Spatola’s house? A Yes. Q Does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4709 - 2017-09-19
in the following colloquy: Q Does that photograph reflect the front of Ms. Spatola’s house? A Yes. Q Does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4709 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Phillip C. Lamson
, party to the crime? DEFENDANT: Yes, I am. THE COURT: If you’re convicted of that offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10189 - 2017-09-20
, party to the crime? DEFENDANT: Yes, I am. THE COURT: If you’re convicted of that offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10189 - 2017-09-20
State v. Phillip C. Lamson
to the crime? DEFENDANT: Yes, I am. THE COURT: If you’re convicted of that offense and you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10189 - 2009-06-16
to the crime? DEFENDANT: Yes, I am. THE COURT: If you’re convicted of that offense and you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10189 - 2009-06-16
[PDF]
State v. Reginald R. Carter
to be free from self-incrimination, sir? CARTER: Yes ma’am. Yes ma’am. THE COURT: Do you understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24868 - 2017-09-21
to be free from self-incrimination, sir? CARTER: Yes ma’am. Yes ma’am. THE COURT: Do you understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24868 - 2017-09-21
State v. Reginald R. Carter
constitutional right to be free from self-incrimination, sir? Carter: Yes ma’am. Yes ma’am. The Court: Do you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24868 - 2006-04-19
constitutional right to be free from self-incrimination, sir? Carter: Yes ma’am. Yes ma’am. The Court: Do you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24868 - 2006-04-19
COURT OF APPEALS
: With respect to you and Mr. Southworth, you were both [in] service in Iraq? Newsome: Yes. The Court: Anything
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72545 - 2011-10-19
: With respect to you and Mr. Southworth, you were both [in] service in Iraq? Newsome: Yes. The Court: Anything
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72545 - 2011-10-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Southworth, you were both [in] service in Iraq? Newsome: Yes. The Court: Anything about that relationship
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72545 - 2014-09-15
. Southworth, you were both [in] service in Iraq? Newsome: Yes. The Court: Anything about that relationship
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72545 - 2014-09-15
State v. Mighty T. Howell
]: Yes, I have. THE COURT: Are you satisfied that he understands the difference and wishes to have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25906 - 2006-08-29
]: Yes, I have. THE COURT: Are you satisfied that he understands the difference and wishes to have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25906 - 2006-08-29
[PDF]
State v. Mighty T. Howell
a court trial and the jury trial? No. 2005AP1668 3 [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Yes, I have. THE COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25906 - 2017-09-21
a court trial and the jury trial? No. 2005AP1668 3 [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Yes, I have. THE COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25906 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, occurred. Hooker responded: “Yeah. I agree to it, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes.” The court continued: Q
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63723 - 2014-09-15
, occurred. Hooker responded: “Yeah. I agree to it, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes.” The court continued: Q
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63723 - 2014-09-15