Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2901 - 2910 of 29823 for des.
Search results 2901 - 2910 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Joseph M. Westcott
below an objective standard of reasonableness is a question of law we review de novo. See id. at 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12076 - 2017-09-21
below an objective standard of reasonableness is a question of law we review de novo. See id. at 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12076 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
356, 362, 369 N.W.2d 186 (Ct. App. 1985). We do not review the record de novo, but rather search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66366 - 2011-06-22
356, 362, 369 N.W.2d 186 (Ct. App. 1985). We do not review the record de novo, but rather search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66366 - 2011-06-22
COURT OF APPEALS
sentenced on inaccurate information is reviewed de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶10 The State concedes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144252 - 2015-07-13
sentenced on inaccurate information is reviewed de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶10 The State concedes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144252 - 2015-07-13
COURT OF APPEALS
, upholding them unless clearly erroneous. Id. We review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107820 - 2014-02-11
, upholding them unless clearly erroneous. Id. We review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107820 - 2014-02-11
State v. Chad R. Rowe
review de novo. See State v. Clappes, 136 Wis.2d 222, 235, 401 N.W.2d 759, 765 (1987); see also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12852 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See State v. Clappes, 136 Wis.2d 222, 235, 401 N.W.2d 759, 765 (1987); see also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12852 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the verdict de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court. Logterman v. Dawson, 190 Wis. 2d 90, 101
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33503 - 2008-07-23
the verdict de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court. Logterman v. Dawson, 190 Wis. 2d 90, 101
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33503 - 2008-07-23
Victor Salbashian v. David C. Matzke
court’s grant of a summary judgment motion de novo, Gaertner v. Holcka, 219 Wis. 2d 436, 446, 580 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2744 - 2005-03-31
court’s grant of a summary judgment motion de novo, Gaertner v. Holcka, 219 Wis. 2d 436, 446, 580 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2744 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo.” Milwaukee Deputy Sheriffs’ Ass’n v. Milwaukee Cnty., 2016 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622415 - 2023-02-16
is a question of law that we review de novo.” Milwaukee Deputy Sheriffs’ Ass’n v. Milwaukee Cnty., 2016 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622415 - 2023-02-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 802.08(2). We review the grant of summary judgment de novo. Estate of Brown v. Mathy Const. Co., 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242472 - 2019-06-20
. § 802.08(2). We review the grant of summary judgment de novo. Estate of Brown v. Mathy Const. Co., 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242472 - 2019-06-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether Sieverding complied with § 800.14 is a question of law this court reviews de novo. See Welin v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208750 - 2018-02-22
. Whether Sieverding complied with § 800.14 is a question of law this court reviews de novo. See Welin v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208750 - 2018-02-22