Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29011 - 29020 of 83778 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 29011 - 29020 of 83778 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Tiggs is not entitled to credit in this case for time served on sentences from Racine and Grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81587 - 2014-09-15
that Tiggs is not entitled to credit in this case for time served on sentences from Racine and Grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81587 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition, and we summarily affirm. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=414413 - 2021-08-24
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition, and we summarily affirm. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=414413 - 2021-08-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
County, had not responded to his open records request pertaining to Milwaukee Co. Case no. 2006FA6891
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=553226 - 2022-08-09
County, had not responded to his open records request pertaining to Milwaukee Co. Case no. 2006FA6891
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=553226 - 2022-08-09
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case for time served on sentences from Racine and Grant Counties. However, we reverse and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81587 - 2012-04-30
in this case for time served on sentences from Racine and Grant Counties. However, we reverse and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81587 - 2012-04-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 In Kenosha County Circuit Court case No. 2014CF374
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218700 - 2018-09-11
of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 In Kenosha County Circuit Court case No. 2014CF374
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218700 - 2018-09-11
Eugene Harris v. Judy Smith
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-2193
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12808 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-2193
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12808 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 28, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
in this case. However, there was no court order denying placement for a year or more. Therefore, we reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27265 - 2006-11-27
in this case. However, there was no court order denying placement for a year or more. Therefore, we reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27265 - 2006-11-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
denying her placement for a year or more.3 We conclude TPR warnings were not required in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27265 - 2014-09-15
denying her placement for a year or more.3 We conclude TPR warnings were not required in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27265 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael R. Weber
. In February 1997, Weber filed another motion alleging negligence in the investigation of his case resulting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14517 - 2005-03-31
. In February 1997, Weber filed another motion alleging negligence in the investigation of his case resulting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14517 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Anjani K. Mehra v. Bay Watch Condominium Association
misrepresented the condominium declaration because the amendment banning rental was invalid. However, the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5099 - 2017-09-19
misrepresented the condominium declaration because the amendment banning rental was invalid. However, the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5099 - 2017-09-19