Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29021 - 29030 of 29958 for de.
Search results 29021 - 29030 of 29958 for de.
State v. Randy J. Lechner
the decision whether a new factor exists is a question of law, which we review de novo, see Franklin, 148 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17163 - 2005-03-31
the decision whether a new factor exists is a question of law, which we review de novo, see Franklin, 148 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17163 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
J. Marshall Osborn v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
and application of the open records law to undisputed facts present questions of law that we review de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16432 - 2017-09-21
and application of the open records law to undisputed facts present questions of law that we review de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16432 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jay D. Krajewski
. This is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Bohling, 173 Wis. 2d at 533. III. ANALYSIS ¶18
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17577 - 2017-09-21
. This is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Bohling, 173 Wis. 2d at 533. III. ANALYSIS ¶18
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17577 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 11
de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711 (1985). No. 2021AP447-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488128 - 2022-04-11
de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711 (1985). No. 2021AP447-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488128 - 2022-04-11
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, ¶30, 301 Wis. 2d 350, 734 N.W.2d 48. We review de novo whether Hendricks (1) "has pointed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208646 - 2018-04-11
, ¶30, 301 Wis. 2d 350, 734 N.W.2d 48. We review de novo whether Hendricks (1) "has pointed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208646 - 2018-04-11
[PDF]
Frontsheet
. § 346.65(2)(am)6. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo, although
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117139 - 2017-09-21
. § 346.65(2)(am)6. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo, although
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117139 - 2017-09-21
State v. David M. Murrell
is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12641 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12641 - 2005-03-31
Alphabetical Listing
(608) 723-6576 De La Rosa, Amy L. CC - Dist Rept (414) 278-4133 DeLong, Katie CC - Milwaukee (414) 278
/contact/Alpha.html - 2025-12-17
(608) 723-6576 De La Rosa, Amy L. CC - Dist Rept (414) 278-4133 DeLong, Katie CC - Milwaukee (414) 278
/contact/Alpha.html - 2025-12-17
Tommy G. Thompson v. Terrance L. Craney
of the Wisconsin Constitution de novo. Polk County v. State Pub. Defender, 188 Wis. 2d 665, 674, 524 N.W.2d 389
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17048 - 2005-03-31
of the Wisconsin Constitution de novo. Polk County v. State Pub. Defender, 188 Wis. 2d 665, 674, 524 N.W.2d 389
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17048 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Cynthia A. Schultz v. Charles J. Sykes
Although Schultz and ALI assert that the proper standard of review in this case is de novo, it is well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2455 - 2017-09-19
Although Schultz and ALI assert that the proper standard of review in this case is de novo, it is well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2455 - 2017-09-19