Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29031 - 29040 of 30059 for de.

[PDF] WI App 70
reviewing questions of law decided by an agency, including statutory interpretation, our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=882268 - 2025-01-24

[PDF] WI APP 22
judgment de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27629 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI 98
it as such. No. 2005AP935 11 and other relevant Wisconsin statutes, a matter of law that we review de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29698 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI 6
, and 907.03. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46620 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Frontsheet
threshold decision under WEPA. Complete de novo review would be akin to treating the entire question
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346910 - 2021-03-16

[PDF] WI 61
reviews de novo whether the facts meet the constitutional standard of reasonable suspicion. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83581 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI 94
on a condemnation award. No. 2005AP1042 9 review de novo. State v. Waushara County Bd
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29685 - 2014-09-15

Frontsheet
rel. Lyons v. De Valk, 47 Wis. 2d 200, 205, 177 N.W.2d 106 (1970). The United States Supreme Court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116726 - 2014-07-08

Cynthia A. Schultz v. Charles J. Sykes
in this case is de novo, it is well settled that we review a circuit court’s decision to impose sanctions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2455 - 2005-03-31

Steven V. v. Kelley H.
process.[4] This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Elizabeth W., 189 Wis. 2d at 435
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5816 - 2005-03-31