Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29031 - 29040 of 38503 for ph d.
Search results 29031 - 29040 of 38503 for ph d.
Derosso Landfill Company, Inc. v. City of Oak Creek
of this state and to fulfill the diverse needs of its citizens." Wis. Stat. § 144.445(1)(d); see also Wis. Stat
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16901 - 2005-03-31
of this state and to fulfill the diverse needs of its citizens." Wis. Stat. § 144.445(1)(d); see also Wis. Stat
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16901 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
-Roman’s confession, on the ground that “[d]uring the interrogation [by Detective Quist] … Ordonia-Roman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110156 - 2014-04-09
-Roman’s confession, on the ground that “[d]uring the interrogation [by Detective Quist] … Ordonia-Roman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110156 - 2014-04-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
no citation to the record. We admonish Hoeft that WIS. STAT. RULE § 809.19(1)(d) and (e) requires
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143523 - 2017-09-21
no citation to the record. We admonish Hoeft that WIS. STAT. RULE § 809.19(1)(d) and (e) requires
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143523 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
commission warden. (b) A qualified out-of-state law enforcement officer.... (c) A former officer.... (d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81085 - 2012-04-16
commission warden. (b) A qualified out-of-state law enforcement officer.... (c) A former officer.... (d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81085 - 2012-04-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to Nichols, No. 2021AP1369 17 the court was still required to “[d]etermine the issues and make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=749277 - 2024-01-09
to Nichols, No. 2021AP1369 17 the court was still required to “[d]etermine the issues and make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=749277 - 2024-01-09
State v. Steven A. Avery
attack.” Section 974.06(3)(d). “[D]ue process may require granting a new trial under sec. 974.06, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11594 - 2005-03-31
attack.” Section 974.06(3)(d). “[D]ue process may require granting a new trial under sec. 974.06, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11594 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jamie L. Pennington
. [D]uring the pre-Miranda statement, [Pennington] was not of the mind-set that she was in custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5782 - 2017-09-19
. [D]uring the pre-Miranda statement, [Pennington] was not of the mind-set that she was in custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5782 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Thomas Hass v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals
of Appeals, Mark A. Ramsden, Raelynn Ramsden and Milton R. Ramsden, d/b/a Ramsden Dairy, Respondents
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16469 - 2017-09-21
of Appeals, Mark A. Ramsden, Raelynn Ramsden and Milton R. Ramsden, d/b/a Ramsden Dairy, Respondents
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16469 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
anything on that he wasn’t suppose[d] to have, was being evasive about that and the time of day and then I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=671916 - 2023-06-27
anything on that he wasn’t suppose[d] to have, was being evasive about that and the time of day and then I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=671916 - 2023-06-27
[PDF]
WI App 73
. For the reasons explained below, we conclude that Syrrakos and Shattuck are not “person[s] who violate[d WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1029169 - 2026-01-26
. For the reasons explained below, we conclude that Syrrakos and Shattuck are not “person[s] who violate[d WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1029169 - 2026-01-26