Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29041 - 29050 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 29041 - 29050 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
NOTICE
-CR 2 second offense, on a plea of no contest following the court’s order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49213 - 2014-09-15
-CR 2 second offense, on a plea of no contest following the court’s order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49213 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at the hearing on the summary judgment motion. The circuit court found that there was no genuine issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242664 - 2019-06-25
at the hearing on the summary judgment motion. The circuit court found that there was no genuine issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242664 - 2019-06-25
[PDF]
State v. Bradley M. Belisle
from a sentence on a conviction for burglary and from the subsequent denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10382 - 2017-09-20
from a sentence on a conviction for burglary and from the subsequent denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10382 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Earnest Alexander
his motion to suppress evidence. Alexander argues police lacked reasonable No. 2005AP466-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19676 - 2017-09-21
his motion to suppress evidence. Alexander argues police lacked reasonable No. 2005AP466-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19676 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 800.14. The court granted the City’s motion and dismissed the appeal with prejudice. Smith appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90905 - 2012-12-20
. § 800.14. The court granted the City’s motion and dismissed the appeal with prejudice. Smith appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90905 - 2012-12-20
State v. Gary Paul Hetto
to Wis. Stat. § 948.09.[1] Hetto argues that the trial court (1) erred by denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2296 - 2005-03-31
to Wis. Stat. § 948.09.[1] Hetto argues that the trial court (1) erred by denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2296 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ricky McMorris
denying his motion to dismiss on double jeopardy grounds.[1] Because we agree with the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18274 - 2005-05-24
denying his motion to dismiss on double jeopardy grounds.[1] Because we agree with the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18274 - 2005-05-24
COURT OF APPEALS
motion seeking to suppress. Because the officer had reasonable suspicion to conduct the investigatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32858 - 2005-03-31
motion seeking to suppress. Because the officer had reasonable suspicion to conduct the investigatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32858 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
2024AP002356 - 2025-10-23 Court Order
23, 2025 Justice Susan M. Crawford has entered the following order: A motion requesting that I
/sc/order/DisplayDocImage.pdf?docId=1029647 - 2025-10-23
23, 2025 Justice Susan M. Crawford has entered the following order: A motion requesting that I
/sc/order/DisplayDocImage.pdf?docId=1029647 - 2025-10-23
Arthur T. Donaldson v. Board of Commissioners of Rock-Koshkonong Lake District
-Koshkonong Lake District, Defendant-Appellant. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 2004 WI 67
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16580 - 2005-03-31
-Koshkonong Lake District, Defendant-Appellant. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 2004 WI 67
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16580 - 2005-03-31