Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29051 - 29060 of 29823 for des.
Search results 29051 - 29060 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
WI App 70
reviewing questions of law decided by an agency, including statutory interpretation, our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=882268 - 2025-01-24
reviewing questions of law decided by an agency, including statutory interpretation, our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=882268 - 2025-01-24
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael D. Mandelman
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25169 - 2017-09-21
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25169 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 9
2018 WI APP 9 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2015AP2162-CR ...
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207784 - 2018-03-16
2018 WI APP 9 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2015AP2162-CR ...
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207784 - 2018-03-16
[PDF]
State v. Jacob J. Faust
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Krajewski, 255 Wis. 2d 98, ¶17. V. ANALYSIS
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16777 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Krajewski, 255 Wis. 2d 98, ¶17. V. ANALYSIS
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16777 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
)2.-5. The interpretation and application of § 51.35 present questions of law that we review de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99312 - 2017-09-21
)2.-5. The interpretation and application of § 51.35 present questions of law that we review de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99312 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶30 As previously explained, custody for purposes of Miranda
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=330568 - 2021-03-22
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶30 As previously explained, custody for purposes of Miranda
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=330568 - 2021-03-22
[PDF]
WI App 24
)-(e). No. 2023AP778 10 DISCUSSION ¶17 On appeal, we review de novo the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778485 - 2024-06-18
)-(e). No. 2023AP778 10 DISCUSSION ¶17 On appeal, we review de novo the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778485 - 2024-06-18
J. Marshall Osborn v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
facts present questions of law that we review de novo, benefiting, however, from the analyses
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16432 - 2005-03-31
facts present questions of law that we review de novo, benefiting, however, from the analyses
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16432 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Steven V. v. Kelley H.
This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Elizabeth W., 189 Wis. 2d at 435-36. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5816 - 2017-09-19
This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Elizabeth W., 189 Wis. 2d at 435-36. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5816 - 2017-09-19
HMO-W Incorporated v. SSM Health Care System
The resolution of the appeal turns on questions of statutory interpretation that we resolve de novo. Thielman v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4804 - 2005-03-31
The resolution of the appeal turns on questions of statutory interpretation that we resolve de novo. Thielman v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4804 - 2005-03-31