Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29051 - 29060 of 83389 for simple case search.

State v. Gary M. Kluwe
court “relied upon long-established law that the standard type of discovery permitted in civil cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12083 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
orders denying postconviction relief in four criminal cases. Baumann contends that the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119163 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Lamont Williams
is procedurally barred and Blakely does not apply retroactively to his case, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7630 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶1 REILLY, J. 1 The only issue on appeal in this case is which statute governs time limits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144396 - 2017-09-21

WI APP 99 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1844 Complete Title of...
2014 WI APP 99 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1844 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121227 - 2014-10-28

[PDF] Monica A. Tanner v. Julie A. Williams
the motion and dismissed the case. Tanner now appeals. II. DISCUSSION ¶4 This case arises following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5410 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
reconsideration, arguing that neither Escalona-Naranjo nor Tillman could be applied in his case because both cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32812 - 2008-05-27

[PDF] CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1077740 - 2026-02-17

[PDF] NOTICE
the trial transcript in this case. Before trial, the court granted a motion to exclude evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49214 - 2014-09-15

State v. Patricia A. Ziebell
of a refusal case once there has been a plea of guilty to the OWI charge. Id. at 359. The supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4241 - 2005-03-31