Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29061 - 29070 of 41617 for she.

State v. Floyd Carter
not submit to the trial court a sworn statement by Finley that she would have, in fact, testified that way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16079 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, the witness must be “[u]navailab[le] for confrontation,” which requires that he or she did not appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96201 - 2014-09-15

Susan C. Nichols v. Mark H. Bennett
, until that date. She also requested copies of Bennett's responses to those requests, but made it clear
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16874 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
.” Id. (citations omitted). Thus, while “[a]n officer may conduct a traffic stop when he or she has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46660 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Ricky D. Stephenson v. Universal Metrics, Inc
that? A: Yes. Q: And she was looking at him when—the bartender was looking at him when he did that? A: Yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2629 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the termination of parental rights (TPR) proceeding. In particular, she contends that the court’s prior order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1066327 - 2026-01-21

COURT OF APPEALS
Haanstad had not “touched any controls of the vehicle necessary to put it in motion while she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31105 - 2007-12-11

State v. Alfredo Ramirez
representation that he or she was the other person or acted with such person’s authorization or consent. Wis JI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3071 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Racine County Human Services Department v. Timothy H.
, and refraining from having contact with Timothy. However, later investigation revealed that she and Timothy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14299 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Dona J. Fabyan v. Waukesha County Board of Adjustment
to claim such status under the facts of this case even if she prevails. Since we affirm the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3276 - 2017-09-19