Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29071 - 29080 of 76979 for judgment for u s.

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
judgments of conviction and order denying Franklin's motion for post-conviction relief. In particular
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17517 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
judgments of conviction and order denying Franklin's motion for post-conviction relief. In particular
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17515 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
judgments of conviction and order denying Franklin's motion for post-conviction relief. In particular
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17516 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jesse Franklin
judgments of conviction and order denying Franklin's motion for post-conviction relief. In particular
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17490 - 2005-03-31

State v. Harlan C. Richards
the Georgia judgment and remanded to the Georgia supreme court for further proceedings not inconsistent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9119 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
judgments of conviction and order denying Franklin's motion for post-conviction relief. In particular
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17518 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
judgments of conviction and order denying Franklin's motion for post-conviction relief. In particular
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17519 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
ROGGENSACK, J. We review the court of appeals'1 decision reversing the circuit court's judgment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540596 - 2022-08-26

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Expert Report of Amicus Matthew Petering, Ph.D. in Support of Proposed Legislative Map 173#008
OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT Case 2023AP001399 Expert Report of Amicus Matthew Petering, Ph.D. in S... Filed 01
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_011224expertreportpetering.pdf - 2024-01-12

State v. Rhea F.
of the decision to terminate his or her parental status is, therefore, a commanding one.’” Odd S.-G. v. Carolyn S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3467 - 2005-03-31