Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29071 - 29080 of 83414 for simple case search.
Search results 29071 - 29080 of 83414 for simple case search.
[PDF]
State v. Patricia A. Ziebell
of a refusal case once there has been a plea of guilty to the OWI charge. Id. at 359. The supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4241 - 2017-09-19
of a refusal case once there has been a plea of guilty to the OWI charge. Id. at 359. The supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4241 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
reconsideration, arguing that neither Escalona-Naranjo nor Tillman could be applied in his case because both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32812 - 2014-09-15
reconsideration, arguing that neither Escalona-Naranjo nor Tillman could be applied in his case because both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32812 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248804 - 2019-10-23
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248804 - 2019-10-23
Patricia A. Andreshak v. Chris Childrey
, 1995, AIGCS sent the complaint to its regional processing office in Iowa. There, the senior case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11042 - 2005-03-31
, 1995, AIGCS sent the complaint to its regional processing office in Iowa. There, the senior case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11042 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1077740 - 2026-02-17
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1077740 - 2026-02-17
Monica A. Tanner v. Julie A. Williams
the motion and dismissed the case. Tanner now appeals. II. DISCUSSION ¶4 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5410 - 2005-03-31
the motion and dismissed the case. Tanner now appeals. II. DISCUSSION ¶4 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5410 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is for a November 1992 burglary conviction. In that case, the court imposed and stayed a sentence of six and one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31330 - 2007-12-26
is for a November 1992 burglary conviction. In that case, the court imposed and stayed a sentence of six and one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31330 - 2007-12-26
COURT OF APPEALS
. DOR, 2003AP3134, unpublished slip op. ¶1 (Wis. Ct. App. Mar. 9, 2005) (Sabol I).[1] In that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34970 - 2008-12-22
. DOR, 2003AP3134, unpublished slip op. ¶1 (Wis. Ct. App. Mar. 9, 2005) (Sabol I).[1] In that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34970 - 2008-12-22
[PDF]
WI 3
2022 WI 3 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2019AP2236 COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=474446 - 2022-01-19
2022 WI 3 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2019AP2236 COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=474446 - 2022-01-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court’s denial of his motion to reopen the judgment in this case pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 806.07 (2015
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218969 - 2018-09-12
court’s denial of his motion to reopen the judgment in this case pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 806.07 (2015
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218969 - 2018-09-12