Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29091 - 29100 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 29091 - 29100 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
, the court suggests an example of an appropriate case “when a new sentence is imposed to run concurrently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32964 - 2008-06-09
, the court suggests an example of an appropriate case “when a new sentence is imposed to run concurrently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32964 - 2008-06-09
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - January 2008
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CALENDAR AND CASE SYNOPSES January 2008 This calendar includes
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31494 - 2014-09-15
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CALENDAR AND CASE SYNOPSES January 2008 This calendar includes
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31494 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
court establishes the law of the case, which must be followed in all subsequent proceedings in the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70587 - 2011-09-06
court establishes the law of the case, which must be followed in all subsequent proceedings in the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70587 - 2011-09-06
COURT OF APPEALS
to the read-in nature of the ’07 case. The trial court then reviewed the explanation of the consequences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50339 - 2010-05-24
to the read-in nature of the ’07 case. The trial court then reviewed the explanation of the consequences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50339 - 2010-05-24
COURT OF APPEALS
stem from two separate lower-court cases, which were consolidated for trial. On Haywood’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83178 - 2012-05-29
stem from two separate lower-court cases, which were consolidated for trial. On Haywood’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83178 - 2012-05-29
[PDF]
State v. Terry Penny
is allowable in this case under the speedy trial statue, § 971.10(3), STATS., which reads: “A court may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12967 - 2017-09-21
is allowable in this case under the speedy trial statue, § 971.10(3), STATS., which reads: “A court may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12967 - 2017-09-21
State v. Terry Penny
statue, § 971.10(3), Stats., which reads: “A court may grant a continuance in a case … if the ends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12967 - 2013-07-16
statue, § 971.10(3), Stats., which reads: “A court may grant a continuance in a case … if the ends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12967 - 2013-07-16
COURT OF APPEALS
in case number 04-CF-01. But not count 2. THE COURT: Count 2 is identical to count 1. It is 12 months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71143 - 2011-09-20
in case number 04-CF-01. But not count 2. THE COURT: Count 2 is identical to count 1. It is 12 months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71143 - 2011-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
review without deference to the circuit court. Id. at 310. As far as we can tell from case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142087 - 2015-05-20
review without deference to the circuit court. Id. at 310. As far as we can tell from case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142087 - 2015-05-20
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 12, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45529 - 2010-01-11
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 12, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45529 - 2010-01-11