Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29091 - 29100 of 29957 for de.
Search results 29091 - 29100 of 29957 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Nicole Schutte
, the interpretation of which presents a question of law we decide de novo. See Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25635 - 2017-09-21
, the interpretation of which presents a question of law we decide de novo. See Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25635 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as to the defendant’s guilt.” Id. This reasonable-probability issue presents a question of law for de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177979 - 2017-09-21
as to the defendant’s guilt.” Id. This reasonable-probability issue presents a question of law for de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177979 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 103
interpretation and application present questions No. 2009AP1557 15 of law that we review de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75718 - 2014-09-15
interpretation and application present questions No. 2009AP1557 15 of law that we review de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75718 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Orion Flight Services, Inc. v. Basler Flight Service
This case presents a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. State v. Reed, 2005 WI
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25227 - 2017-09-21
This case presents a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. State v. Reed, 2005 WI
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25227 - 2017-09-21
Columbia Propane v. Wisconsin Gas Company
decision granting summary judgment. Our review of that decision is de novo, and we apply the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3487 - 2005-03-31
decision granting summary judgment. Our review of that decision is de novo, and we apply the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3487 - 2005-03-31
Gene L. Olstad v. Microsoft Corporation
years and 6 months or both. Wis. Stat. § 133.03.[6] ¶17 This court reviews de novo the circuit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18993 - 2005-07-12
years and 6 months or both. Wis. Stat. § 133.03.[6] ¶17 This court reviews de novo the circuit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18993 - 2005-07-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
issues that we decide de novo. See Kersten v. H.C. Prange Co., 186 Wis. 2d 49, 56, 520 N.W.2d 99 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717354 - 2023-10-19
issues that we decide de novo. See Kersten v. H.C. Prange Co., 186 Wis. 2d 49, 56, 520 N.W.2d 99 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717354 - 2023-10-19
[PDF]
Geoffrey L. Bilda v. Milwaukee County
became effective January 1, 2001. Discussion ¶6 We review summary judgment decisions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25969 - 2017-09-21
became effective January 1, 2001. Discussion ¶6 We review summary judgment decisions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25969 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 96
are questions of law we review de novo. State v. Sorenson, 2000 WI 43, ¶15, 234 Wis. 2d 648, 611 N.W.2d 240
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33413 - 2014-09-15
are questions of law we review de novo. State v. Sorenson, 2000 WI 43, ¶15, 234 Wis. 2d 648, 611 N.W.2d 240
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33413 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 59
of discretion); Wren, 389 Wis. 2d 516, ¶16 (reviewing de novo whether the party asserting laches proved all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=845748 - 2024-11-12
of discretion); Wren, 389 Wis. 2d 516, ¶16 (reviewing de novo whether the party asserting laches proved all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=845748 - 2024-11-12