Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29091 - 29100 of 58509 for speedy trial.
Search results 29091 - 29100 of 58509 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
NOTICE
on appeal is whether the Complaints were properly joined for trial. Because joinder was appropriate under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54868 - 2014-09-15
on appeal is whether the Complaints were properly joined for trial. Because joinder was appropriate under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54868 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Town of Monroe v. Bowmar Appraisal, Inc.
court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3798 - 2017-09-20
court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3798 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
. The arbitrator’s decision fits squarely within the language of the parties’ agreement.[2] The trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28948 - 2007-05-08
. The arbitrator’s decision fits squarely within the language of the parties’ agreement.[2] The trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28948 - 2007-05-08
State v. David Barton
of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. Barton contends a new trial should be ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20764 - 2006-01-24
of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. Barton contends a new trial should be ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20764 - 2006-01-24
[PDF]
State v. David Barton
and an order denying his postconviction motion. Barton contends a new trial should be ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20764 - 2017-09-21
and an order denying his postconviction motion. Barton contends a new trial should be ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20764 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Frank Curiel
and, following several adjournments, a trial was held on December 2, 1996. On the day of trial, Curiel waived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12454 - 2017-09-21
and, following several adjournments, a trial was held on December 2, 1996. On the day of trial, Curiel waived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12454 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the State’s closing argument
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876429 - 2024-11-19
that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the State’s closing argument
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876429 - 2024-11-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2011AP1645 2 At trial, the core dispute was whether, given the new access situation, Hodge would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84169 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2011AP1645 2 At trial, the core dispute was whether, given the new access situation, Hodge would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84169 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
during trial. The jury returned guilty verdicts on the remaining three counts. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139074 - 2017-09-21
during trial. The jury returned guilty verdicts on the remaining three counts. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139074 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of the exposing counts was dismissed by the State during trial. The jury returned guilty verdicts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139074 - 2015-04-06
of the exposing counts was dismissed by the State during trial. The jury returned guilty verdicts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139074 - 2015-04-06