Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2911 - 2920 of 63731 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 2911 - 2920 of 63731 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to sentencing and adopted the joint recommendation of the parties. It deferred entry of judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=749724 - 2024-01-11
to sentencing and adopted the joint recommendation of the parties. It deferred entry of judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=749724 - 2024-01-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to sentencing and adopted the joint recommendation of the parties. It deferred entry of judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=749724 - 2024-01-11
to sentencing and adopted the joint recommendation of the parties. It deferred entry of judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=749724 - 2024-01-11
[PDF]
State v. Renee L. Reek
and an order denying her postconviction motion for additional sentence credit. Reek argues that time she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2541 - 2017-09-19
and an order denying her postconviction motion for additional sentence credit. Reek argues that time she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2541 - 2017-09-19
State v. Renee L. Reek
of four misdemeanors and an order denying her postconviction motion for additional sentence credit. Reek
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2541 - 2005-03-31
of four misdemeanors and an order denying her postconviction motion for additional sentence credit. Reek
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2541 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals an order denying his motion for 512 days’ sentence credit. Because we conclude he is not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94317 - 2013-03-18
appeals an order denying his motion for 512 days’ sentence credit. Because we conclude he is not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94317 - 2013-03-18
Robin H. v. Ronald J.B.
and custody of Brittany when it denied her motion for a change of placement. Robin argues that a powerful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3049 - 2005-03-31
and custody of Brittany when it denied her motion for a change of placement. Robin argues that a powerful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3049 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robin H. v. Ronald J.B.
to the care and custody of Brittany when it denied her motion for a change of placement. Robin argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3049 - 2017-09-19
to the care and custody of Brittany when it denied her motion for a change of placement. Robin argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3049 - 2017-09-19
M&I Bank of Southern Wisconsin v. Robert F. Lins
the judgment against Edith because the co-defendants were joint and severally liable. The Bank contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6751 - 2005-03-31
the judgment against Edith because the co-defendants were joint and severally liable. The Bank contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6751 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Virginia Smith v. Terrance A. Smith
argument, heard Terrance’s defense, agreed with his side of it and denied the motion. Virginia appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2888 - 2017-09-19
argument, heard Terrance’s defense, agreed with his side of it and denied the motion. Virginia appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2888 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
M&I Bank of Southern Wisconsin v. Robert F. Lins
settlement partially satisfied the judgment against Edith because the co-defendants were joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6751 - 2017-09-20
settlement partially satisfied the judgment against Edith because the co-defendants were joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6751 - 2017-09-20