Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2911 - 2920 of 16449 for commentating.
Search results 2911 - 2920 of 16449 for commentating.
[PDF]
State v. James W. Knipfer
that a reasonable jury could not possibly have interpreted the story as a comment on Knipfer’s failure to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25261 - 2017-09-21
that a reasonable jury could not possibly have interpreted the story as a comment on Knipfer’s failure to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25261 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to the County regarding environmental degradation. The court merely commented that the evidence did not show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65643 - 2011-06-13
to the County regarding environmental degradation. The court merely commented that the evidence did not show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65643 - 2011-06-13
COURT OF APPEALS
, takes the “credible people” comment out of context. In context, the court tempers this comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54713 - 2010-09-22
, takes the “credible people” comment out of context. In context, the court tempers this comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54713 - 2010-09-22
CA Blank Order
that the court disregard Walker’s letter; and (3) whether the court’s comments at the initial sentencing hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95391 - 2013-04-15
that the court disregard Walker’s letter; and (3) whether the court’s comments at the initial sentencing hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95391 - 2013-04-15
[PDF]
Holly E. Reyniers v. Lance A. Reyniers
and conclusions of law prepared by Holly as its own disposition without further comment. Lance argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13172 - 2017-09-21
and conclusions of law prepared by Holly as its own disposition without further comment. Lance argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13172 - 2017-09-21
State v. James W. Knipfer
interpreted the story as a comment on Knipfer’s failure to testify. We agree. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25261 - 2006-05-24
interpreted the story as a comment on Knipfer’s failure to testify. We agree. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25261 - 2006-05-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the court failed to consider mitigating comments he made in his allocution. ¶4 Copley began his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68842 - 2014-09-15
the court failed to consider mitigating comments he made in his allocution. ¶4 Copley began his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68842 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was sufficient to support the verdict. No. 2012AP2605-CR 5 ¶9 As to the prosecutor’s comments, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102298 - 2017-09-21
was sufficient to support the verdict. No. 2012AP2605-CR 5 ¶9 As to the prosecutor’s comments, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102298 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert J. King
sense by promising “to view positively” King’s honest cooperation. Comments to accuseds about possible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11235 - 2005-03-31
sense by promising “to view positively” King’s honest cooperation. Comments to accuseds about possible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11235 - 2005-03-31
Holly E. Reyniers v. Lance A. Reyniers
disposition without further comment. Lance argues on appeal that the trial court misused its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13172 - 2005-03-31
disposition without further comment. Lance argues on appeal that the trial court misused its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13172 - 2005-03-31