Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2911 - 2920 of 16451 for commenting.
Search results 2911 - 2920 of 16451 for commenting.
[PDF]
State v. Brook E. Grzelak
. Judge Greenwood concluded that Judge Dilweg’s sentencing comments indicated reliance on parole policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15835 - 2017-09-21
. Judge Greenwood concluded that Judge Dilweg’s sentencing comments indicated reliance on parole policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15835 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
May a judge meet in chambers with a representative of a special interest group without violating the Code of Judicial Ethics?
Judicial Conduct Advisory Committee 2 The purpose of the rule is stated in the amended comment
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=885 - 2017-09-20
Judicial Conduct Advisory Committee 2 The purpose of the rule is stated in the amended comment
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=885 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
or sentence modification, Copley alleged the court failed to consider mitigating comments he made in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68842 - 2011-08-01
or sentence modification, Copley alleged the court failed to consider mitigating comments he made in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68842 - 2011-08-01
[PDF]
Rock County Department of Human Services v. Tawanna W.
by the rules of civil procedure. See id. The right to remain silent and the right to be free from comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7468 - 2017-09-20
by the rules of civil procedure. See id. The right to remain silent and the right to be free from comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7468 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
court approved circuit court’s approach at resentencing: adopting comments from original sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51347 - 2014-09-15
court approved circuit court’s approach at resentencing: adopting comments from original sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51347 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
JD-1791 Permanency Hearing Order
[if any] Comments: 6. The placement of the child/juvenile continues no longer
/formdisplay/JD-1791.pdf?formNumber=JD-1791&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-11-25
[if any] Comments: 6. The placement of the child/juvenile continues no longer
/formdisplay/JD-1791.pdf?formNumber=JD-1791&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-11-25
CA Blank Order
that the court disregard Walker’s letter; and (3) whether the court’s comments at the initial sentencing hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95391 - 2013-04-16
that the court disregard Walker’s letter; and (3) whether the court’s comments at the initial sentencing hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95391 - 2013-04-16
[PDF]
State v. Carl E. Cunningham
, the prosecutor commented that he didn’t think “there’s a single kind of crime … that [Cunningham] hasn’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6570 - 2017-09-19
, the prosecutor commented that he didn’t think “there’s a single kind of crime … that [Cunningham] hasn’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6570 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark E. Sostarich
considered Attorney Sostarich's significant health concerns, commented that there was no real financial
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24518 - 2017-09-21
considered Attorney Sostarich's significant health concerns, commented that there was no real financial
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24518 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that the sentencing court’s comments about Graham’s mandatory release date were not inaccurate and, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34908 - 2008-12-22
that the sentencing court’s comments about Graham’s mandatory release date were not inaccurate and, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34908 - 2008-12-22