Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2911 - 2920 of 69850 for his.
Search results 2911 - 2920 of 69850 for his.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Attorney Thomas Brady Aquino has filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925103 - 2025-03-11
denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Attorney Thomas Brady Aquino has filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925103 - 2025-03-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2017-18)1 postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. Parker’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297207 - 2020-10-21
his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2017-18)1 postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. Parker’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297207 - 2020-10-21
[PDF]
State v. Juan Smith
-2947-CR 2 (1) erroneously exercised its discretion in denying his motion to adjourn the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3209 - 2017-09-19
-2947-CR 2 (1) erroneously exercised its discretion in denying his motion to adjourn the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3209 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. STAT § 940.02(1) (2003-04).1 He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30269 - 2014-09-15
. STAT § 940.02(1) (2003-04).1 He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30269 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Shawn P. Krawczyk
, Judge. Affirmed. DEININGER, J.1 Shawn P. Krawczyk appeals an order declaring his refusal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12598 - 2017-09-21
, Judge. Affirmed. DEININGER, J.1 Shawn P. Krawczyk appeals an order declaring his refusal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12598 - 2017-09-21
State v. Kenneth P. Sarauer
in violation of Wis. Stat. § 940.19(3).[1] He contends that the State infringed his constitutional right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6136 - 2005-03-31
in violation of Wis. Stat. § 940.19(3).[1] He contends that the State infringed his constitutional right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6136 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). Kupsky filed a response to the no-merit report raising multiple challenges to his conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=594965 - 2022-11-29
). Kupsky filed a response to the no-merit report raising multiple challenges to his conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=594965 - 2022-11-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2017-18)1 postconviction motion without a hearing. We conclude all claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271516 - 2020-07-21
of his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2017-18)1 postconviction motion without a hearing. We conclude all claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271516 - 2020-07-21
[PDF]
State v. Eduardo R.
to WIS. STAT. § 941.29 (2).3 On appeal, E.R. argues that the trial court erred when it denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2451 - 2017-09-19
to WIS. STAT. § 941.29 (2).3 On appeal, E.R. argues that the trial court erred when it denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2451 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily enter his guilty pleas and whether the circuit court properly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581285 - 2022-10-25
not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily enter his guilty pleas and whether the circuit court properly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581285 - 2022-10-25