Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2911 - 2920 of 13007 for me.
Search results 2911 - 2920 of 13007 for me.
COURT OF APPEALS
believed that the facility “would probably be the safest place” to “get away from people trying to run me
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90674 - 2012-12-17
believed that the facility “would probably be the safest place” to “get away from people trying to run me
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90674 - 2012-12-17
State v. Daniel R. Nehring
court explained: There is no reason—and it appears to me from the pictures it’s probably not even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3807 - 2005-03-31
court explained: There is no reason—and it appears to me from the pictures it’s probably not even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3807 - 2005-03-31
State v. Floyd A. Worth
reject probation, but I don’t feel that probation would do me any good because of my belief and my
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13191 - 2005-03-31
reject probation, but I don’t feel that probation would do me any good because of my belief and my
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13191 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
that he never offered me that. If it’s true, that in itself is ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48465 - 2014-09-15
that he never offered me that. If it’s true, that in itself is ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48465 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
we can do about that, that is the right given to them by the statutes and the procedure. He asked me
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36121 - 2009-04-08
we can do about that, that is the right given to them by the statutes and the procedure. He asked me
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36121 - 2009-04-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
will do.” The court then ruled as follows: [F]irst, it does not seem to me that the note was endorsed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118460 - 2014-09-15
will do.” The court then ruled as follows: [F]irst, it does not seem to me that the note was endorsed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118460 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Mark R. Kuhn
reference to preceding events: On this date, July 9, I called you [and] you told me that you couldn't
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9692 - 2017-09-19
reference to preceding events: On this date, July 9, I called you [and] you told me that you couldn't
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9692 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that [Vivar] could hear [him]” and said to Juan: “Juan, can you come talk to me?” Officer Rupprecht
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141752 - 2017-09-21
that [Vivar] could hear [him]” and said to Juan: “Juan, can you come talk to me?” Officer Rupprecht
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141752 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
City of Madison v. Robert R. Schultz
. SCHULTZ: It is if I can show animosity towards me. THE COURT: No, it isn’t. It is just not -- plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15158 - 2017-09-21
. SCHULTZ: It is if I can show animosity towards me. THE COURT: No, it isn’t. It is just not -- plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15158 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
” tone “[l]oud enough that [Vivar] could hear [him]” and said to Juan: “Juan, can you come talk to me
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141752 - 2015-05-13
” tone “[l]oud enough that [Vivar] could hear [him]” and said to Juan: “Juan, can you come talk to me
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141752 - 2015-05-13