Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2911 - 2920 of 83395 for simple case search.
Search results 2911 - 2920 of 83395 for simple case search.
[PDF]
State v. James E. Multaler
the background leading to the search warrant at issue in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2786 - 2017-09-19
the background leading to the search warrant at issue in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2786 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 25
the search in that case lawful and not suppressed the drug evidence if the pouch had been large enough
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239468 - 2019-08-13
the search in that case lawful and not suppressed the drug evidence if the pouch had been large enough
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239468 - 2019-08-13
State v. Douglas J. Miller
. Specifically, Miller contends that the police were required to obtain a search warrant before submitting his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3659 - 2005-03-31
. Specifically, Miller contends that the police were required to obtain a search warrant before submitting his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3659 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
searched the other people in the car without finding any marijuana. See id. ¶8 In this case, only two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138608 - 2017-09-21
searched the other people in the car without finding any marijuana. See id. ¶8 In this case, only two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138608 - 2017-09-21
State v. Joseph R. Luebeck
2006 WI App 87 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP1013-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24829 - 2006-05-30
2006 WI App 87 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP1013-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24829 - 2006-05-30
[PDF]
State v. Joseph R. Luebeck
2006 WI APP 87 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2005AP1013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24829 - 2017-09-21
2006 WI APP 87 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2005AP1013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24829 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
inspects an inmate’s body, depending on case-by-case circumstances that may make a more intrusive search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124595 - 2014-10-15
inspects an inmate’s body, depending on case-by-case circumstances that may make a more intrusive search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124595 - 2014-10-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
search, we note that these factors serve to highlight the case-by-case nature of the determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124595 - 2017-09-21
search, we note that these factors serve to highlight the case-by-case nature of the determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124595 - 2017-09-21
2009 WI APP 140
, and that Gant does not apply as this is not a search incident to an arrest case. ¶25 In Terry, the United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39214 - 2009-09-28
, and that Gant does not apply as this is not a search incident to an arrest case. ¶25 In Terry, the United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39214 - 2009-09-28
[PDF]
WI APP 140
. Gant is distinguishable from the instant case because it was a search incident to an arrest case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39214 - 2014-09-15
. Gant is distinguishable from the instant case because it was a search incident to an arrest case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39214 - 2014-09-15