Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29101 - 29110 of 58950 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 29101 - 29110 of 58950 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Lincoln County v. Misty K.
, this court rejects Misty’s argument that her claimed errors entitle her to a new trial in the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2098 - 2005-03-31
, this court rejects Misty’s argument that her claimed errors entitle her to a new trial in the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2098 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jamal D. Jones
preserves the Riverside claim. Finally, Jones argues that the trial court violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9217 - 2005-03-31
preserves the Riverside claim. Finally, Jones argues that the trial court violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9217 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jerry Saenz v. John Husz
on a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for monetary damages.2 We reject both contentions and affirm the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8599 - 2017-09-19
on a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for monetary damages.2 We reject both contentions and affirm the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8599 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jay A. Jansen
court erred in its analysis of his entrapment defense. Although the trial court accepted his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8596 - 2017-09-19
court erred in its analysis of his entrapment defense. Although the trial court accepted his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8596 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Production Stamping Corporation v. Maryland Casualty Company
Stamping Corporation by the owner of property bordering Production Stamping's facility, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9108 - 2017-09-19
Stamping Corporation by the owner of property bordering Production Stamping's facility, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9108 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
document …would have been ruled nonadmissible and irrelevant.” The court rejected Rizzo’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50853 - 2010-06-15
document …would have been ruled nonadmissible and irrelevant.” The court rejected Rizzo’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50853 - 2010-06-15
[PDF]
Lincoln County v. Misty K.
, this court rejects Misty’s argument that her claimed errors entitle her to a new trial in the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2098 - 2017-09-19
, this court rejects Misty’s argument that her claimed errors entitle her to a new trial in the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2098 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael L. Marks
. Irene claimed that after Marks gave her a ride to her brother’s workplace, Marks took her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6610 - 2017-09-19
. Irene claimed that after Marks gave her a ride to her brother’s workplace, Marks took her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6610 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
their claims that Roger and Caryn Landowski misrepresented the extent of a defect in the basement of the home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52030 - 2010-07-20
their claims that Roger and Caryn Landowski misrepresented the extent of a defect in the basement of the home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52030 - 2010-07-20
COURT OF APPEALS
acknowledged that the prosecutor recommended the six-year prison sentence promised, but Smith claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68268 - 2011-07-25
acknowledged that the prosecutor recommended the six-year prison sentence promised, but Smith claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68268 - 2011-07-25