Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29101 - 29110 of 58507 for speedy trial.
Search results 29101 - 29110 of 58507 for speedy trial.
State v. Monika S. Lackershire
of a trial. We discern no error and affirm the judgment and order. Background ¶2 In November 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20271 - 2006-01-09
of a trial. We discern no error and affirm the judgment and order. Background ¶2 In November 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20271 - 2006-01-09
State v. Antraun Jordan
the trial court's order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Jordan claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8870 - 2005-03-31
the trial court's order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Jordan claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8870 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
granting a WIS. STAT. § 801.63 motion to stay the proceeding and permit trial in a foreign forum. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117398 - 2017-09-21
granting a WIS. STAT. § 801.63 motion to stay the proceeding and permit trial in a foreign forum. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117398 - 2017-09-21
William O. Chaudoir v. City of Sturgeon Bay
and challenged the special assessment. A bench trial followed. The Chaudoirs opposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14967 - 2005-03-31
and challenged the special assessment. A bench trial followed. The Chaudoirs opposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14967 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, the postconviction motion alleged trial counsel was ineffective for not objecting. The motion was heard by a judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32501 - 2014-09-15
, the postconviction motion alleged trial counsel was ineffective for not objecting. The motion was heard by a judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32501 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
challenge the trial court’s decision to dismiss their counterclaim and third-party complaint.[2] We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136997 - 2015-03-09
challenge the trial court’s decision to dismiss their counterclaim and third-party complaint.[2] We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136997 - 2015-03-09
[PDF]
Frontsheet
inappropriate comments to a self-represented defendant in the trial of that same small claims case. The facts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253154 - 2020-01-30
inappropriate comments to a self-represented defendant in the trial of that same small claims case. The facts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253154 - 2020-01-30
COURT OF APPEALS
order granting a Wis. Stat. § 801.63 motion to stay the proceeding and permit trial in a foreign forum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117398 - 2014-07-21
order granting a Wis. Stat. § 801.63 motion to stay the proceeding and permit trial in a foreign forum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117398 - 2014-07-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the State’s closing argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876429 - 2024-11-19
that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the State’s closing argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876429 - 2024-11-19
State v. Jesse Sanchez
, as a party to a crime, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 961.41(1)(cm)1 and 930.05.[1] Sanchez argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3093 - 2005-03-31
, as a party to a crime, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 961.41(1)(cm)1 and 930.05.[1] Sanchez argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3093 - 2005-03-31