Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29121 - 29130 of 43184 for t o.
Search results 29121 - 29130 of 43184 for t o.
COURT OF APPEALS
, Wendt said, “[I]t doesn’t really matter, I’m going to jail.” The deputy then decided to arrest Wendt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114677 - 2014-06-17
, Wendt said, “[I]t doesn’t really matter, I’m going to jail.” The deputy then decided to arrest Wendt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114677 - 2014-06-17
State v. Pastori M. Balele
States Supreme Court. Citing City of Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U.S. 95 (1983), he asserts that "[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9591 - 2005-03-31
States Supreme Court. Citing City of Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U.S. 95 (1983), he asserts that "[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9591 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this summary disposition order will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Court of Appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260793 - 2020-05-19
that this summary disposition order will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Court of Appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260793 - 2020-05-19
COURT OF APPEALS
on D.W.’s credibility. We disagree. As aptly explained by the State, “[t]estimony that D.W. is not able
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108315 - 2014-02-24
on D.W.’s credibility. We disagree. As aptly explained by the State, “[t]estimony that D.W. is not able
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108315 - 2014-02-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
testimony that the officer had seen Schmidt make a throwing motion. ¶12 Schmidt argues that “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121951 - 2014-09-18
testimony that the officer had seen Schmidt make a throwing motion. ¶12 Schmidt argues that “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121951 - 2014-09-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that “[t]he parties shall consider the GAL’s suggestion outlined below for placement after May 31, 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76403 - 2014-09-15
that “[t]he parties shall consider the GAL’s suggestion outlined below for placement after May 31, 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76403 - 2014-09-15
State v. Patricia A. Weed
inside, and Michael allegedly said, “[t]hat’s the reason I took the bullets out of the .357.”[1] Three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4032 - 2005-03-31
inside, and Michael allegedly said, “[t]hat’s the reason I took the bullets out of the .357.”[1] Three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4032 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 13, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=355764 - 2021-04-13
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 13, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=355764 - 2021-04-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” and will “accept reasonable inferences from the facts available to the circuit court.” Id., ¶38. Further, “[t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182188 - 2017-09-21
” and will “accept reasonable inferences from the facts available to the circuit court.” Id., ¶38. Further, “[t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182188 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 14, 2020 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257973 - 2020-04-14
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 14, 2020 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257973 - 2020-04-14